Why not Mesa 97.0? Mozilla would be proud.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Developers' Planned Changes Still Coming To Mesa 13.1 / Mesa 17.0
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Holograph View PostThese developers seem to have a major case of ADHD and are getting distracted from their task of programming Mesa, which does not require this switch.
Comment
-
He, he, i like M.A.M.E. versioning, it is currently at version 0.180 after 20 years and how it goes it won't reach version 1.0 even after 100 years
It is "put some number on it", even for Firefox who look really look at numbers much, what matters is what binary you run... is it current esr, release, beta, aurora or you compile it or whatever
For mesa it is the same, do you run something ancient or maybe old-stable, stable or your own build of whatever
Comment
-
Originally posted by Holograph View PostI'm super disappointed to see the stupid date-based versioning idea go forward. I want versions based around the actual progress of the library. A date-based versioning scheme does help people know when a particular version is released, but that isn't something that many people need to know! Why!? Why are they wasting time even considering this? These developers seem to have a major case of ADHD and are getting distracted from their task of programming Mesa, which does not require this switch.
Nobody is going to know if it is worth upgrading to a given version - or even if a given version has improvements for them - or even if a given version is safe for them to try as far as stability goes.
Please consider to choose your words better in the future
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostI'm amazed at the mirror-climbing you had to do to fit ADHD in here. How about you choose a illness that fits more the situation on hand?Last edited by timofonic; 02 December 2016, 05:50 PM.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Holograph View PostI'm super disappointed to see the stupid date-based versioning idea go forward. I want versions based around the actual progress of the library. A date-based versioning scheme does help people know when a particular version is released, but that isn't something that many people need to know! Why!? Why are they wasting time even considering this? These developers seem to have a major case of ADHD and are getting distracted from their task of programming Mesa, which does not require this switch.
Nobody is going to know if it is worth upgrading to a given version - or even if a given version has improvements for them - or even if a given version is safe for them to try as far as stability goes.
Comment
Comment