Mesa 9.2 Release Candidate 1 Now Surfaces

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • adam777
    replied
    Originally posted by RussianNeuroMancer View Post
    Thanks for the heads up.
    Since posting things went even worse - system will lock for no apparent reason, so I reverted to 9.1.6.

    Leave a comment:


  • RussianNeuroMancer
    replied
    Originally posted by adam777 View Post
    First attempt worked like a charm - played a video for a few seconds in mpv using UVD (hwdec=vdpau, vo=vdpau) without any problem.
    Since then, everything went downhill - mpv can't play anymore, it will just lock (and take the whole system with it) once it's done with the initialization phase (filter selection etc.).[/CODE]
    Looks like this one: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67994.

    Leave a comment:


  • GreatEmerald
    replied
    Originally posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
    You know what would be even cooler?

    Release Mesa 9.2 as Mesa 11, because OpenGL 3.3. is essentially done.

    Then, when the last features needed for OpenGL 3.2 are finished, release Mesa 10! Because 3.2 < 3.3.

    Then go to Mesa 12 when OpenGL 4 is released.

    That would be kind of cool. ... I guess.

    Maybe not?
    Nah, that's not how it works. You can't advertise OGL 3.3 compliance before 3.2 features are all complete. So by extension you can't advertise Mesa 11 before Mesa 10 features are done

    Leave a comment:


  • pingufunkybeat
    replied
    Originally posted by mattst88 View Post
    We've joked that since we'd be jumping two GL versions, we'd jump two Mesa versions as well. Also, then we could say "This Mesa goes to 11"
    You know what would be even cooler?

    Release Mesa 9.2 as Mesa 11, because OpenGL 3.3. is essentially done.

    Then, when the last features needed for OpenGL 3.2 are finished, release Mesa 10! Because 3.2 < 3.3.

    Then go to Mesa 12 when OpenGL 4 is released.

    That would be kind of cool. ... I guess.

    Maybe not?

    Leave a comment:


  • Ericg
    replied
    Originally posted by Alejandro Nova View Post
    Not enough (the bug I'm referring to was fixed on August 3th, and we are waiting for Mesa 9.2 rc1)
    Theeeeeeen wait and see if they bump the git snapshot before release, or just wait for the official release *shrugs* All you can do unless you want to compile it yourself.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alejandro Nova
    replied
    Originally posted by Ericg View Post
    Code:
    sudo yum info mesa-dri-drivers
    Its already mesa 9.2 (July 23rd snapshot)
    Not enough (the bug I'm referring to was fixed on August 3th, and we are waiting for Mesa 9.2 rc1)

    Leave a comment:


  • GreatEmerald
    replied
    Originally posted by mattst88 View Post
    We've joked that since we'd be jumping two GL versions, we'd jump two Mesa versions as well. Also, then we could say "This Mesa goes to 11"
    That's exactly what I was referring to

    Leave a comment:


  • smitty3268
    replied
    Originally posted by mattst88 View Post
    Also, then we could say "This Mesa goes to 11"
    But then we'd have no incentive to ever develop GL 4.0 support.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ericg
    replied
    Originally posted by Alejandro Nova View Post
    BTW, where are Fedora packages of this? Mesa 9.2.0 rc1 solves an important issue with EGL + r600g (vsync is broken), so if I can get those updated packages, I'll finally be able to use KDE 4.11 with EGL and v-sync. So Mesa 9.2.0 is really important for us.
    Code:
    sudo yum info mesa-dri-drivers
    Its already mesa 9.2 (July 23rd snapshot)

    Leave a comment:


  • Alejandro Nova
    replied
    BTW, where are Fedora packages of this? Mesa 9.2.0 rc1 solves an important issue with EGL + r600g (vsync is broken), so if I can get those updated packages, I'll finally be able to use KDE 4.11 with EGL and v-sync. So Mesa 9.2.0 is really important for us.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X