Originally posted by Kivada
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Open-Source Linux Graphics Card Showdown
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Gusar View PostNo. The Clarkdale/Ironlake combo was what you describe (hence the different name for CPU and GPU), but Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge are a combined CPU+GPU chip, just like AMD APU.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Luke_Wolf View PostSandy Bridge it is still 2 chips on one package according to the analysis, with a pipe between them
Comment
-
Originally posted by droidhacker View PostColors are funny things to work with mathematically. The main thing you need to keep in mind is that you have to treat colors as THREE numbers, not just ONE.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gusar View PostHmm, can someone (preferably an Intel dev) confirm that? If I'm wrong, I'd like to know, so that I won't be saying wrong stuff in the future anymore.
There is just a pipe between the 2 sections of the chip, so communication between the 2 is exactly the same as if it was on a different chip, but it's built as one.
AMD iGPUs are the same. Actually, not quite - Sandy/Ivy Bridge share the L3 cache with the GPU, while AMD doesn't have that ability. Unless Trinity adds that, which it might.
Eventually they will get better integrated, and you'll probably see things like the CPU transferring floating point operations onto the GPU hardware, but i don't know how far out that is.
Comment
-
HD4000 linux vs. winsows; windows OGL3.3?
could we have comparison between Ivybridge OGL linux and Windows drivers? Some time back there was such comparison provided on phoronix for sandybridge and it was very helpful. Thanks!
I found info here on geeks3d.com that Ivybridge Windows driver supports OGL3.3. Do you see same result?
Thanks again!
Comment
-
Originally posted by droidhacker View PostColors are funny things to work with mathematically. The main thing you need to keep in mind is that you have to treat colors as THREE numbers, not just ONE.
Comment
Comment