Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mesa 7.11 Release Candidate 1 Arrives

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • kraftman
    replied
    Originally posted by marek View Post
    Isn't your hardware slow?
    Not for OA or Q3. It was very smooth on my old GF2 MX 400. ;> I have Athlon X2 5000+, 2GB RAM and Ati x1600xt, now.

    Leave a comment:


  • kraftman
    replied
    Originally posted by curaga View Post
    Is your card AGP by any chance?
    No, it's a PCI E. X1600XT. I will have to check some other games, too. Maybe there's a problem with OA only.

    Leave a comment:


  • marek
    replied
    Originally posted by kraftman View Post
    Then I wonder why it sucks so much on my box?
    Isn't your hardware slow?

    Leave a comment:


  • ahlaht
    replied
    Setting clock rates manually

    Originally posted by kraftman View Post
    Then I wonder why it sucks so much on my box?
    That's what I had been wondering with my evergreen card for months until I found out the clock speeds are not set correctly on my system.

    If you haven't already make sure the clocks have been set to something reasonable:
    Code:
    cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/radeon_pm_info
    I suspect power management is currently the biggest problem Radeon users have with Mesa.

    I have slowly been doing something to improve the situation because my laptop has several useful clock modes that are not used at all even if I manually set "low", "mid", or "high"! Those almost randomly picked clock modes or the 2 that are used by dynpm are just not good enough in my case.

    I wonder if it would be acceptable for mainline inclusion to make a kernel patch and an user mode program that could be used to manually select sane clock modes for fixed profiles and dynpm? Perhaps it could even be part of driconf?

    Leave a comment:


  • curaga
    replied
    Originally posted by kraftman View Post
    Then I wonder why it sucks so much on my box?
    Is your card AGP by any chance?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jonno
    replied
    Originally posted by fatih View Post
    What are the minimum requirements for drm,libdrm,and co ?
    libdrm 2.4.24 is required.
    I believe it is supposed to work with any drm version, but some features and optimizations will be disabled unless you are using drm from at least linux 2.6.39.

    Leave a comment:


  • kraftman
    replied
    Originally posted by marek View Post
    There are indeed new r300g optimizations in 7.11. From the top of my head:
    - faster vertex uploads (also on r600g)
    - new optimized winsys that completely bypasses (doesn't use) libdrm_radeon
    - new fragment shader register allocator
    Thanks. I will check this out when 7.11 will get into Arch stable repo.

    Leave a comment:


  • kraftman
    replied
    Originally posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
    r300g is comparable to Catalyst in performance now.

    Has been for quite a while.
    Then I wonder why it sucks so much on my box?

    Leave a comment:


  • fatih
    replied
    What are the minimum requirements for drm,libdrm,and co ?

    Leave a comment:


  • marek
    replied
    Originally posted by kraftman View Post
    It will be great to see some optimizations for r300g, because even Open Arena is hardly playable.
    There are indeed new r300g optimizations in 7.11. From the top of my head:
    - faster vertex uploads (also on r600g)
    - new optimized winsys that completely bypasses (doesn't use) libdrm_radeon
    - new fragment shader register allocator

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X