Originally posted by Ex-Cyber
View Post
-
Which wiki is that? 3.2/1.5 will be a fair amount of work, but 3.3/3.3 is downright tiny. And I think 3.1/1.4 is fairly small, but I'm not 100% sure. Anyway, you're probably right that it's unlikely GLSL 1.4 would be finished for the next release, but we can hope. -
Call me a pessimist, but I don't see 3.3 or even 3.1 coming with the next release. The wiki describes each of GLSL 1.40 and GLSL 1.50 as "piles and piles of work" that will take "months", and doing a release takes some time even when the bulk of it is "done". Anyway, I'd be plenty happy to see GL 3 support solidify in time for the next round of spring/summer distro releases (I'm assuming that it will likely arrive too late for the fall/winter ones)Leave a comment:
-
Yep. 3.0 to 3.3 would be easier than the to do list that's left for 3.0. 4.0 can rot for 3 years before anybody notices.Originally posted by pingufunkybeat View PostLeave a comment:
-
and float-depth buffers: now done. Thanks Marek. http://lists.freedesktop.org/archive...ne/009085.htmlThe only items for attaining OpenGL 3.0 support that haven't been worked on at all are the float-depth buffers and depth format cube textures.
At this rate, maybe we should be shooting for GL 3.1 for the next release.Leave a comment:
-
Yes, but OpenGL 3.0 bridged decades of neglect and decay, while everything after that added relatively minor functionality. I don't think that it compares to the huge leap that is/was needed to bring GL 3.Beyond OpenGL 3.0, there's already 3.1/3.2/3.3 and even OpenGL 4.0/4.1 to additionally address.
OpenGL 3 will be the major milestone for Mesa. I can't wait.Leave a comment:
-
Mesa's OpenGL 3.0 TODO List Is Becoming Smaller
Phoronix: Mesa's OpenGL 3.0 TODO List Is Becoming Smaller
Via a commit to the TODO list concerning Mesa's support for the OpenGL 3.0 specification, Marek Ol??k has confirmed that vertex texture image units for OGL3 are "DONE" and working on the R600 Gallium3D driver...
Leave a comment: