Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mesa 22.3 Lands New "Rusticl" OpenCL 3.0 Implementation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by ArchLinux View Post
    I do not agree with this.
    Then you need to be really fast with upstreaming your better solution bevor rusticl has time to settle in.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Tian View Post
      will it work on intel gpus?
      This is the single most important question.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by binarybanana View Post
        This is the single most important question.
        Is it? They seam to be already cancelled. It would be more promising to support some random chinese GPUs they atleast don't come with the Intel stigma of one dGPU every 20 years.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by ArchLinux View Post
          I do not agree with this.
          Oh. Well, in that case, let's scrap the whole thing. Thanks for your vital input.

          Comment


          • #15
            Oh happy day!!! I can finally ditch closed-source PRO drivers! Thank you Karol!

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by binarybanana View Post

              This is the single most important question.
              AFAIK it **only** works with Intel (i)GPUs ATM.
              ## VGA ##
              AMD: X1950XTX, HD3870, HD5870
              Intel: GMA45, HD3000 (Core i5 2500K)

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by unis_torvalds View Post
                Oh happy day!!! I can finally ditch closed-source PRO drivers! Thank you Karol!
                Not yet, no radeonsi support at the moment.
                ## VGA ##
                AMD: X1950XTX, HD3870, HD5870
                Intel: GMA45, HD3000 (Core i5 2500K)

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by darkbasic View Post

                  Not yet, no radeonsi support at the moment.
                  Why OpenGL? Wouldn't it interface directly with AMDGPU?

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by ArchLinux View Post
                    I do not agree with this.
                    Why do you care?

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by unis_torvalds View Post

                      Why OpenGL? Wouldn't it interface directly with AMDGPU?
                      radeonsi isn't opengl, radeonsi is a gallium backend, radeonsi is also used for clover, galliumnine opengl, and even iirc, the libva backend and I think even an omx backend

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X