Originally posted by stalkerg
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
VA-API AV1 Decode Lands In Mesa 21.3 Gallium3D
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by agurenko View PostHm, somehow I'd don't have even H264 acceleration on my 6700XT with Mesa 21.1.7... does any one have any suggestions why?
Code:$ vainfo libva info: VA-API version 1.11.0 libva info: Trying to open /usr/lib64/dri/radeonsi_drv_video.so libva info: Found init function __vaDriverInit_1_11 libva info: va_openDriver() returns 0 vainfo: VA-API version: 1.11 (libva 2.11.0) vainfo: Driver version: Mesa Gallium driver 21.1.7 for AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (NAVY_FLOUNDER, DRM 3.41.0, 5.13.10-200.fc34.x86_64, LLVM 12.0.1) vainfo: Supported profile and entrypoints VAProfileMPEG2Simple : VAEntrypointVLD VAProfileMPEG2Main : VAEntrypointVLD VAProfileNone : VAEntrypointVideoProc
Code:$ vdpauinfo display: :0 screen: 0 API version: 1 Information string: G3DVL VDPAU Driver Shared Library version 1.0 Video surface: name width height types ------------------------------------------- 420 16384 16384 NV12 YV12 422 16384 16384 UYVY YUYV 444 16384 16384 Y8U8V8A8 V8U8Y8A8 420_16 16384 16384 422_16 16384 16384 444_16 16384 16384 Decoder capabilities: name level macbs width height ---------------------------------------------------- MPEG1 0 1048576 16384 16384 MPEG2_SIMPLE 3 1048576 16384 16384 MPEG2_MAIN 3 1048576 16384 16384 H264_BASELINE --- not supported --- H264_MAIN --- not supported --- H264_HIGH --- not supported ---
- Likes 6
Comment
-
Originally posted by Masush5 View Post
known kernel regression: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1673
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Masush5 View Post
known kernel regression: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1673
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by brad0 View Post
If it was an AMD only issue I'd buy that but when pretty much everyone isn't on the scene then it's not a surprise.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mdedetrich View PostLinux not having a singular backwards compatible GUI toolkit is not making things easier. I mean there are things like Qt (which are properly cross platform as a bonus) but then you will always have someone from the Linux side complaining (i.e. gnome people saying it doesn't adhere to their design guidelines).
Comment
-
Originally posted by brad0 View PostIt's a shitshow all around. Qt is cross platform but cross platform toolkits are a never ending joke. They never look well across most of the OS's they support. You build with Qt and GNOME users will complain. You build with Gtk+ and KDE users will complain. I don't blame either side.
I have no idea if Qt is any better on THAT front - but even Firefox, which is using GTK, on a GTK desktop, has literally NEVER rendered scrollbars etc correctly for more than maybe a month or two at a time at best, just because of GTK's CONSTANT random breakages from one version to the next. sigh...
Comment
Comment