Originally posted by bridgman
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Nouveau Developers Remain Blocked By NVIDIA From Advancing Open-Source Driver
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by duby229 View Post
You do make an excellent point. I can't honestly say I know what's going on in China in this matter. But I think I can say with reasonable sureness that it's not happening at that scale in the rest of the world. If accurate then its akin to to cutting off the right hand to spite the left.
Comment
-
Originally posted by duby229 View PostNo, he was talking about nvidia's actions... Over-reactions they take that seriously hurt themselves with the OSS communities. That was my point.
Test signature
Comment
-
Originally posted by bridgman View Post
Sorry, I meant the saying about the cold and the achilles tendon, not the actions that prompted the comment.
Comment
-
Originally posted by horizonbrave View PostCould someone please suggest me if my Dell Latitude E6520 with a Nvidia Quadro NVS 4200M and integrated Intel HD 3000 will run better with the propietary drivers or Noveau ones? Cheers
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by duby229 View Post
Well, this is just my opinion, but you'll get a better 3d experience with the proprietary drivers. And you'll get a better desktop experience with Nouveau. Nouveau suffers from lack of help from nvidia and the most complex parts of the driver aren't well supported. On the other hand Nvidia's DDX driver, IMO, is the worst DDX driver of them all at this current time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by debianxfce View PostNo I am not, but you have problems (to read etc).
When I reboot perhaps once a day or have machine turned on for a week, just letting it sleep meanwhile..
What does it matter if it boots 2 seconds faster or slower??
In server-space it's especially meaningless. RAID controller could initialize 2 minutes before being ready for work and it may work a year non-stop.
Originally posted by debianxfce View Posthttps://freedesktop.org/wiki/Softwar...Optimizations/
"16. Don't use debug kernels. Debug kernels are slow. "
First, 1000Hz kernel may be great deal shittier use case than 250Hz. Some of the "normal" kernel functionalities depend on debug-features - remove the latter and you have shit breaking. It all depends on particular situations. This is one of the reasons you won't have 1000Hz non-debug kernels by default - not distributor's stupidity.
In desktop use few ms does not matter, in gaming few fps does not matter. Before calling me beginner - I've played shooters on competitive level in the past, so I am not just pulling fast ones on you.
You may of course tweak the hell out of your system - how much time are you actually saving? Does tweaking takes summarily more or less time than you save afterwards?Last edited by aht0; 17 December 2017, 07:46 AM.
Comment
Comment