Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Nouveau Linux 4.8 + Mesa 12.1-dev vs. NVIDIA OpenGL Performance
Collapse
X
-
Superior software is a problem for AMD, because their drivers introduce a lot of overhead while the NVIDIA's driver doesn't. That's why when AMD cards get the games closer to the "bare metal" with Vulkan they see a large improvement, while NVIDIA's cards don't see much (because their drivers are close to optimal already).
-
Originally posted by trek View Post
I've got the idea that Nvidia has superior software (but not hardware) and they try defend their advantage improving the closed source driver and not helping open source knowledge sharing
Also superior software is not the problem here. First because there isn't and second because I spoke just for open power management, so I can run whatever I want to my ASIC like Gallium Nine. Anyway If Nvidia thinks they are right, then lets put it in Wikipedia under the terminology NSIC and not ASIC, if it is to run only what Nvidia likes.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Temar View PostWe sponsor that manufacturer because
Originally posted by Temar View Postwe don't have time to play with our operating system, we want to get things done.
Originally posted by Temar View PostYou call that "linux-hostile", I call that excellent linux support.
Leave a comment:
-
"We sponsor that manufacturer because it is the only one who can provide a full-featured driver"
Too easy. Non-proprietary (if you know what that means) drivers are wiser, undebatably.
"giving you access to the full performance of the hardware you bought"
Community-created and *almost* full performance is still much more powerful, since the people now _know_ how the drivers work.
"Nvidia just works, we don't have time to play with our operating system, we want to get things done"
Unintelligible.
"You call that "linux-hostile", I call that excellent linux support."
Have a good day.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Temar View Post
We sponsor that manufacturer because it is the only one who can provide a full-featured driver, giving you access to the full performance of the hardware you bought. Nvidia just works, we don't have time to play with our operating system, we want to get things done.
You call that "linux-hostile", I call that excellent linux support.
*pun intended
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pal666 View Posti have better question: how people still have money/time/motivation to sponsor most linux-hostile hardware manufacturer
You call that "linux-hostile", I call that excellent linux support.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by andre30correia View Postfor desktop if people wants to use opensource driver amd is the only alternative for gaming, no point in spending so much money and use opensource nvidia driver, the lack of dynamic clock is big problem for performance and lifetime of a card who always use the maximum freqs. For AMD is about time to give up from non free driver and put all resources in opensource driver like intel (one driver), when they reach the parity of features, opengl 4.5 vulkan vdpau/vaapi and enduro
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: