(F.U.C.) You Nvidia Corporate!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NVIDIA Alerts Nouveau: They're Starting To Sign/Validate GPU Firmware Images
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by dungeon View Post
Yeah, but Stallman is not a god of logic. First error, he splits a person from a company-organism, i can create a small company and produce a free processor that is an order of magnitude cheaper than ARM (no license fees) and exactly as users want because they would have being involved id development. Second error, the first thing is ownership of knowledge by people and not ownership of a product-material. And a right thing, he did predict that you will be able to print a chip in your home from an X material flakes with good resolution.
Comment
-
Originally posted by emblemparade View PostEveryone who cares about freedom should be using Intel GPUs.
Comment
-
Well, NVIDIA could just sign firmware images developed by Nouveau.
EDIT: On the other hand, it is very kind of NVIDIA that it does allow loading independent firmware images, albeit with slightly reduced capabilities.
It could just lock the whole platform down.
Comment
-
Originally posted by CTown View PostAnother example, Intel pumps a lot of money into Israel. Plenty of people say Israel turned the Gaza Strip into the current largest concentration camp in the world. So, besides the fact Intel makes relatively weak GPUs to AMD or NVIDIA, there are other reasons to avoid Intel.
It does not mean that Intel supports the war there and conduct of Israel.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mat2 View PostWell, NVIDIA could just sign firmware images developed by Nouveau.
EDIT: On the other hand, it is very kind of NVIDIA that it does allow loading independent firmware images, albeit with slightly reduced capabilities.
It could just lock the whole platform down.
Comment
-
Indeed-software freedom is only one part of the picture
Originally posted by CTown View PostI'm sorry to take the ambiguity of your post and mention politics on this site but you probably meant software freedom. For instance, Intel used under handed tricks to try to run their only competitor out of the market. Another example, Intel pumps a lot of money into Israel. Plenty of people say Israel turned the Gaza Strip into the current largest concentration camp in the world. So, besides the fact Intel makes relatively weak GPUs to AMD or NVIDIA, there are other reasons to avoid Intel.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/...0HH1F720140922
Intel will give software freedom with one hand and destroy hardware freedom with the other, and for years has been considered among the more severe corporate offenders. Involvement with Israeli occupation is bad enough, I know a LOT of people who prefer AMD even in used hardware for that one reason. The cooperation between a great many major tech companies and the makers of things like facial recognition cameras, speed cameras, and data mining systems is another issue that affects everyone who lives where there is electricity. Also, I'm sure Intel helped George W Bush and his predecessors and sucessors get a lot of war toys.
It's too bad a 3-d printer can't fab a computer chip, that would solve a LOT of problems-given those, making boards would not be soo difficult and it woul be awful hard to hide backdoors on a "dumb board" that came with only the copper traces and sockets, ready to have ALL the chips added to it. Any fab process at the Pentium level (500nm) would be enough to make this useful for a basic websurfing machine in the 10-20W range.
Comment
-
Originally posted by vivo View PostJust before reading this article, I was thinking about replacing my 770 with a 970.
I guess I will have to wait and see. If I don't like what I see, AMD here I come.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Luke View PostYou are NOT kidding! Meatspace freedom and equality are both far more important-and are a major part of what I use free software to do. In fact, as an anticapitalist I use the entire FOSS community as a model of economics applicable to any activity not involving resource scarcity. To put is another way: if someone steals my bike, it's the fact that it is no longer available for me to ride that is problematic, not the fact that they now have a bike. Someone sitting next to my bike furiously building a clone with their own parts I would have no right to complain about-even if I were a first-ranked racer, which I am not,
Intel will give software freedom with one hand and destroy hardware freedom with the other, and for years has been considered among the more severe corporate offenders. Involvement with Israeli occupation is bad enough, I know a LOT of people who prefer AMD even in used hardware for that one reason. The cooperation between a great many major tech companies and the makers of things like facial recognition cameras, speed cameras, and data mining systems is another issue that affects everyone who lives where there is electricity. Also, I'm sure Intel helped George W Bush and his predecessors and sucessors get a lot of war toys.
It's too bad a 3-d printer can't fab a computer chip, that would solve a LOT of problems-given those, making boards would not be soo difficult and it woul be awful hard to hide backdoors on a "dumb board" that came with only the copper traces and sockets, ready to have ALL the chips added to it. Any fab process at the Pentium level (500nm) would be enough to make this useful for a basic websurfing machine in the 10-20W range.
Printing a CPU at home; that sounds AWESOME!
Also, I'm glad NVIDIA gave Nouveau the heads up on this one. Though, it's unfortunate that when one part of hardware opens up (the booting process thanks to Coreboot) another closes.
Comment
Comment