They can use the entire MESA, Intel's work and LLVM with a proper and full back-end, and create very easy, an Open Driver with 70-90% the performance of the Closed one. Then they can use the latest OGL4 work as a Closed Extension Driver for the Open one. When we say Extension Driver we mean only Shader Compilers, FX and Programs for the Rasterizer(synthesizer), not any Driver Functionality like memory management, that should be Open.
Bickering Continues About NVIDIA Using DMA-BUF
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Rigaldo View PostNo, people will probably not start jumping to nouveau. And if they do, many will have serious issues and won't care much about whether it's open or not when they just out of it, or from Linux in general. This won't help opensource in anyway, maybe hurt it though.
Well, I wonder in how far losing these people will hurt open source.
Originally posted by Rigaldo View PostAnd NVIDIA will NOT opensource their driver. Heck, even if their management wanted to, they couldn't.
Originally posted by log0 View PostLinux Kernel is GPL2 period. Don't like open source? Go somewhere else.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by alexThunder View PostPeople who don't care about open source are going to use more closed source?
Well, I wonder in how far losing these people will hurt open source.
The world doesn't spin around NVidia. Neither does Linux.
Word.
No users means your demands will go on deaf ears. And it's natural .. -.-
Not nice, but natural.
Comment
-
-
...
Originally posted by LLStarks View PostAlan Cox is an asshole.
I have an Optimus laptop and as things stand, I will never get the expected performance out of my GT 555M on Linux.
Nouveau's use of dma-buf is not a solution. It works, but it's as slow as using the Intel GPU. Plus, the power management puts my card in an unusable state when I want to reboot into Windows.
I SHOULD BE ABLE TO USE THE NVIDIA BLOB AND DMA-BUF AS I SEE FIT FOR MY OWN PERSONAL NEEDS.
Alan Cox wrote some code, and he is deciding what happens to it, I guess you can always spend your time developing your alternative to this problem instead of making pointless insults of someone who has done great work for many people...
Originally posted by Rigaldo View PostMore users alone can help open source. It gives more power and influence on let's say .. NVIDIA.
No users means your demands will go on deaf ears. And it's natural .. -.-
Not nice, but natural.Last edited by dm-xterm; 18 October 2012, 02:41 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Rigaldo View PostMore users alone can help open source. It gives more power and influence on let's say .. NVIDIA.
No users means your demands will go on deaf ears. And it's natural .. -.-
Not nice, but natural.
Or to be more general: More people not caring about open source and using proprietary software will do more good to open source than actually having and keeping things open?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Rigaldo View Post...
Btw nvidia are already violating linux kernel license, no matter if this symbols are changed or not. And they should really let their lawyers handle this and not the devs.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LLStarks View PostAlan Cox is an asshole.
I have an Optimus laptop and as things stand, I will never get the expected performance out of my GT 555M on Linux.
Nouveau's use of dma-buf is not a solution. It works, but it's as slow as using the Intel GPU. Plus, the power management puts my card in an unusable state when I want to reboot into Windows.
I SHOULD BE ABLE TO USE THE NVIDIA BLOB AND DMA-BUF AS I SEE FIT FOR MY OWN PERSONAL NEEDS.
YOU are an asshole.
Comment
-
-
Agreed
Originally posted by whitecat View PostYOU bought an Optimus laptop.
YOU are an asshole.
Comment
-
Comment