Originally posted by bug77
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Open-Source NVIDIA Outlook Brighter Due To GSP Firmware, But Major Challenges Remain
Collapse
X
-
- Likes 6
-
this is very exciting, some cheat rtx 2060s are around, and I have been very tempted to pick one up. intel dgpu playing with it for a bit has been neat, but the growing pains are strong (still cannot get vaapi to work) on the A380 after messing with it for a few days. it certainly shows potential though, it's sitting in my second gpu slot while me and a friend try to get vaapi working on it. but it will be nice to have good foss support from nvidia. even if unofficial
Comment
-
Originally posted by oleid View Post
Well, if we could include the source code of the firmware within the kernel source code we wouldn't need a stable blob ABI.Last edited by piotrj3; 14 September 2022, 08:33 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fitzie View Post
nvidia only opensourced their driver because they were starting to lose sales. they have nothing like the amdgpu effort which was amd's goal to create a native linux driver, which was a significant effort, and was well after they decided to go opensource. There was some considerable motivation at the time because amd was the only game in town. while nvidia is more popular for enterprises for gpgpu, that market is moving to dedicated training hardware. If nvidia is going to make its move to have an upstreamed gpu driver, they better get started soon. It would be amazing not to think of nvidia hardware as avoid-if-possible, but these days for desktop, having an discrete gpu is starting to become a liability, not a plus.
NVidia did this because Linux is moving to Wayland and since their EGLStream effort didn't get community buy-in, they were forced to do this in order to properly support GBM/KMS etc etc for Wayland. There were other reasons as well, i.e. their current distribution method doesn't work well with some distros.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by mdedetrich View Post
The naivety/cluelessness of some people is outstanding. I can almost guarantee you that NVidia's decision to opensource a tiny part of their graphics stack (even calling it open sourcing is a stretch, they basically put some logic into closed firmware on the onboard graphics chip, i.e. GSP and the open source part is an interface + glue code to that firmware) had nothing to do with recent sales, due to the fact that such decision are preplanned years before.
NVidia did this because Linux is moving to Wayland and since their EGLStream effort didn't get community buy-in, they were forced to do this in order to properly support GBM/KMS etc etc for Wayland. There were other reasons as well, i.e. their current distribution method doesn't work well with some distros.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by fitzie View Post
nvidia only opensourced their driver because they were starting to lose sales. they have nothing like the amdgpu effort which was amd's goal to create a native linux driver, which was a significant effort, and was well after they decided to go opensource. There was some considerable motivation at the time because amd was the only game in town. while nvidia is more popular for enterprises for gpgpu, that market is moving to dedicated training hardware. If nvidia is going to make its move to have an upstreamed gpu driver, they better get started soon. It would be amazing not to think of nvidia hardware as avoid-if-possible, but these days for desktop, having an discrete gpu is starting to become a liability, not a plus.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hamishmb View PostLinux on desktop might be only a small fraction of their sales, but on the server side it's likely to be a very different picture, considering that most servers run Linux now.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment