Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Open-Source NVIDIA/Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Driver At The End Of 2019 - Poor But A Lot Of Hope

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CochainComplex
    replied
    Originally posted by loganj View Post
    CochainComplex is that your own company? cool. plus do you use linux there? also, at my office (where we use only a linux server) we use to buy dell too and the guys from IT were in contact with the guys from dell for the configuration of the stations. Anyway we gave up dell and switch to a regional brand. Why people thinks that dell is the only one on the market?
    sorry engl is not my native tounge - I mean the company I m working for. it is a physics research institute with around 3000 employes. I have no idea what kind of contract they have with dell. But it is rather difficult to get a "out of line" device unless it is some special measurement equipment. I tried to but a mobile workstation is too ordinary to justify the extra paperwork.

    Leave a comment:


  • CochainComplex
    replied
    Originally posted by loganj View Post
    yoshi314 so thats nvidia problem? since others are not able to do what they did it somehow became nvidia's problem. the way i see it its like all people blaming nvidia for what others can't achieve. they gave you the hardware and provided the driver for it but somehow its still not good because they don't open their drivers/whatever like amd did. but if you look at amd, navi still has no support for opencl even after so many months from its release. no wonder you have to stick with nvidia. is amd opencl also proprietary software?
    There are a few market principles - Monopoly (Pseudo-Monopoly) arent good for anyone. Thats the issue. One might mention the Windows Monopoly here.
    Since you are here - I would assume you are using Linux and you also suffer from the Windows Dominance at one or another point.

    The most recent AMD/Intel showdown on the CPU market has shown what a good competition can change even if you dont like the competitor.

    Intels Monopoly had to:

    - lower Prices
    - increase Corecount
    - accelerate 7nm approaches

    This is what Intel Fanboys gain because of a strong competitor.

    And btw sometimes Monopoly is not gained by classic free market principles - just to spin you imagination ...https://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/14/b...14compete.html

    Leave a comment:


  • loganj
    replied
    CochainComplex is that your own company? cool. plus do you use linux there? also, at my office (where we use only a linux server) we use to buy dell too and the guys from IT were in contact with the guys from dell for the configuration of the stations. Anyway we gave up dell and switch to a regional brand. Why people thinks that dell is the only one on the market?

    Leave a comment:


  • CochainComplex
    replied
    Originally posted by hotaru View Post

    there's your problem right there. Dell knows that anyone who chooses an i9 cares more about showing off how much money they wasted than about actually using the computer.
    well ..my company has a contract with Dell. I can not choose another supplier.

    Leave a comment:


  • CochainComplex
    replied
    Originally posted by loganj View Post
    CochainComplex OneTimeShot but again you are not forced to buy it. im sure you can build your own station (like i always do) or find a station with amd gpus. some vendors even let you configure your station before purchase. i'm pretty sure you have alternatives to nvidia.
    In my company I have to choose Dell - which isnt that bad but for mobile workstations there is not a lot to choose if you want the most powerfull ones (eg Precission 7X40 - least powerfull gpu amd then 4 more powerfull choices ..nvidia).

    p.s.: if I have the abiltiy to build my own rig it is the first thing i would do use amd cards. But with notebooks you have a rather reduced set of options to build it by your own
    Last edited by CochainComplex; 12-27-2019, 02:40 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • loganj
    replied
    bridgman ok. sorry for talking bs. i thought that navi does not has opencl support under linux. all i found about it was under windows. i have to admit i didn't search too deep since i don't own any amd cards. and thanks for info about ROCm and AMDGPU-PRO.

    Leave a comment:


  • bridgman
    replied
    Originally posted by loganj View Post
    yoshi314 but if you look at amd, navi still has no support for opencl even after so many months from its release. no wonder you have to stick with nvidia.
    ???

    Navi has had OpenCL support for Linux since launch day.

    The only thing missing right now is official ROCm stack support for Navi, although kernel support is upstream and userspace is running internally.

    Originally posted by loganj View Post
    yoshi314 is amd opencl also proprietary software?
    The ROCm stack version of OpenCL is open source; the packaged version included with AMDGPU-PRO is not, although >95% of the packaged OpenCL code is the same as what we *do* release in open source form as part of ROCm OpenCL and AMDVLK Vulkan.

    The only closed source bit left AFAIK is the glue code between the OpenCL runtime and PAL, but since we are gradually moving to using ROCm for all the compute paths that last bit will become obsolete over time anyways.

    https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute...OpenCL-Runtime
    Last edited by bridgman; 12-26-2019, 01:12 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • loganj
    replied
    yoshi314 so thats nvidia problem? since others are not able to do what they did it somehow became nvidia's problem. the way i see it its like all people blaming nvidia for what others can't achieve. they gave you the hardware and provided the driver for it but somehow its still not good because they don't open their drivers/whatever like amd did. but if you look at amd, navi still has no support for opencl even after so many months from its release. no wonder you have to stick with nvidia. is amd opencl also proprietary software?

    Leave a comment:


  • hotaru
    replied
    Originally posted by OneTimeShot View Post
    selects i9 processor.
    there's your problem right there. Dell knows that anyone who chooses an i9 cares more about showing off how much money they wasted than about actually using the computer.

    Leave a comment:


  • OneTimeShot
    replied
    Originally posted by loganj View Post
    CochainComplex OneTimeShot but again you are not forced to buy it. im sure you can build your own station (like i always do) or find a station with amd gpus. some vendors even let you configure your station before purchase. i'm pretty sure you have alternatives to nvidia.
    Hmm... Visits Dell, selects i9 processor. Nope - Nvidia only.


    Note: I'm not saying that it is impossible to buy an AMD workstation. Just that in my experience it seems to be somewhat hard.
    Last edited by OneTimeShot; 12-26-2019, 08:59 AM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X