Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Windows 10 vs. Linux 4.15 + Mesa 17.4-dev Radeon Gaming Performance
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by pal666 View Postdesperate try at rationalizing stockholm syndrome
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by papajo View PostI dont praise AMD 24/7
Comment
-
Originally posted by pal666 View Postof course you are not, you are busy praising nvidia
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVpOyKCNZYw
I really did not have anything else to do to my system when it used to have a nvidia card... other than when I installed ubuntu 15 I had to click a graphical window (update manager) and click on nvidia drivers instead of nouveau...
From that point on everything happened on its own on the background without me needing to mess around with anything else... I could even OC my card, I could set preferences via a graphical environment I could monitor temps I could have sound over HDMI and my performance was very close to windows and in somecases virtually identical.
My experience after upgrading to a RX 580 is very different in many levels... the only pro side is that now I see the ubuntu loading screen in my native resolution... and that's it. Everything else still is a pain in the ass.
And if you ignore all the practical issues (having to experiment with unstable kernels manually set and install stuff etc having to make compromises on functionality like AMD VCE and audio over HDMI) and check out the benchmarks even with other kernel versions and drivers etc a GTX 1060 is still faster than a RX 580 sometimes by a lot.. and that should not be true (if we were on windows) https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...80-linux&num=3
And judging from my system I can tell that most of those average FPS are "fake" because there is a lot of jitter even if the framerate is mostly above 60 FPS... things just are not smooth.
However I believe in opensource and hope that this will get resolved sometime in the near future, I am just disappointed not towards the opensource developers but towards AMD Inc because I believe that if nvidia can maintain such good closed drivers then the least AMD should do is to help the open source community to speed up their progress which apparently they dont since polaris architecture is like on its 3rd year now almost and basic functions still dont exist in the driver...Last edited by papajo; 30 November 2017, 11:58 AM.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by papajo View Postin E-V-E-R-Y-T-H-I-N-G else nvidia drivers are better for the end user in terms of consumer experience (so ideology about free software etc aside)
Honestly, if it wasn't for gaming, I'd have used my GTX 670 with Nouveau. When I did, it provided a more pleasant desktop experience.
You know how I got vulkan support for my RX 580? I [...] had to manually install the packs myself through the terminal...
Relive (AMD VCE ) is still not supported..
You want sound over HDMI with your RX 580 ?? huh good joke... Nvidia had it since ever..
heck with nvidia drivers I can even just monitor my graphics card temps and fan speed on their graphical window I dont have to trust the terminal "sensors" command which always seems to show the same temp and fan speed while I hear different fan noises coming out of the box...
And the performance... OMG its sucks... Its bellow any standards... the benchmarks you see here are by installing many things manually custom (and unstable) kernels custom firmware etc
I literally score 70 FPS avg in the Tomb raider bench when the graphics are set on NORMAL 1080p...and its a 2013 game... on high graphics I have seen even 12 FPS for a big chunk of the game.. On the other hand with nvidia I had small differences compared to windows
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by papajo View PostHowever I believe in opensource and hope that this will get resolved sometime in the near future, I am just disappointed not towards the opensource developers but towards AMD Inc because I believe that if nvidia can maintain such good closed drivers then the least AMD should do is to help the open source community to speed up their progress which apparently they dont since polaris architecture is like on its 3rd year now almost and basic functions still dont exist in the driver...
1. AMD developers make up the bulk of the "open source community" working on AMD drivers. This has been the case for a number of years.
2. You may be confusing what is available in open source drivers with what is available upstream. Things like audio functionality have been publicly available from day one for Polaris in both AMDGPU-PRO packages and source code repos, but that same code was only just now accepted upstream.Test signature
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by bridgman View Post
Couple of things:
1. AMD developers make up the bulk of the "open source community" working on AMD drivers. This has been the case for a number of years.
2. You may be confusing what is available in open source drivers with what is available upstream. Things like audio functionality have been publicly available from day one for Polaris in both AMDGPU-PRO packages and source code repos, but that same code was only just now accepted upstream.
I dont know why that is.. I just know that as an end consumer my experience is significantly worse on the linux side while the other company may have better windows experience too but has not neglected the linux side or if you dont like the word "neglect" then is better on making drivers for the linux side.
Comment
Comment