Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AMDGPU DC Pull Request Submitted For Linux 4.15 Kernel - 132,395 Lines Of Code

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by pal666 View Post
    you are lunatict
    I am not lunatic, it is Gazebo's song:

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by pal666 View Post
      the fact of the matter is, no matter how dc code is bad, it will never be a burden for nvidia users. or for everyone else who is not using dc-requiring chip(vega atm). and how you can you be so stupid to think that no video at all or same dc code out of tree will be less of a burden for vega users?
      What an utterly useless statement. Not sure what Nvidia has anything to do with this, and Vega users have had options before this merging (like with amdgpu-pro drivers). Do your research.
      you could write a book "how to rule universe without attracting attention of nurses", in the meanwhile real world can rely on amd an this code is merged
      It appears you have failed to understand my point. Even Bridgman understood what I said, and had a thoughtful response as a result.
      Originally posted by pal666 View Post
      probably they are not drug addicts and don't understand your fantasies.
      in real world amd is one of most active vendors in kernel development https://lwn.net/Articles/736578/
      Can you spare the community with your useless ramblings? If you don't agree with what I have to say, fine, but you have the most fruitless comments. Yes, AMD is one of the most active developers - that doesn't have anything to do with what I'm saying.

      Stay on topic.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
        What an utterly useless statement. Not sure what Nvidia has anything to do with this,
        nvidia was example of hardware, whose users will be not burdened by dc because their kernel binary will not contain dc code
        Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
        and Vega users have had options before this merging (like with amdgpu-pro drivers).
        i already listed better option (out of tree driver), but it is more burden than upstreamed driver
        Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
        It appears you have failed to understand my point.
        successful merge tells me i didn't
        Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
        Can you spare the community with your useless ramblings?
        you first
        Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
        Yes, AMD is one of the most active developers - that doesn't have anything to do with what I'm saying.
        well, usually reality has nothing to do with what you are saying

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by pal666 View Post
          nvidia was example of hardware, whose users will be not burdened by dc because their kernel binary will not contain dc code
          I still don't see the relevance in bringing them up. Besides, they could still be indirectly influenced, whether that be a regression that affects something kernel-level, or just merely slowing down development of the kernel itself.
          i already listed better option (out of tree driver), but it is more burden than upstreamed driver
          Uh... hardly. If using amdgpu-pro or even a git driver is too much work for you, either don't complain or don't use Linux. Ironic you seem to intentionally ignore Nvidia here, seeing as they do the same thing.
          successful merge tells me i didn't
          No, you still failed to understand. First of all, what I was speaking of was hypothetical. I didn't look at the code, but Dave felt wary about it. I trust his opinion on a code's condition over yours any day. Second, just because the code was accepted, that doesn't make anything you said more valid. Just because something is accepted, that doesn't make its problems just disappear (take any corrupt politician voted into office, for example).

          Comment

          Working...
          X