I'd really appreciate some haschat benchmarks
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
OpenCL Remains One Of AMDGPU-PRO's Main Advantages, Can't Wait For It To Be Open
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Bleep View PostI'd really appreciate some haschat benchmarksMichael Larabel
https://www.michaellarabel.com/
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pontostroy View PostFor opencl-pro on default amdgpu and mesa you just need 5 files from pro driver(3 libs, 1 symlink and icd config file), but anyway i wait for TAHITI support for opencl-pro, llibdrm_amdgpu from pro does not know TAHITI, libamdolc* has TAHITI strings
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pontostroy View PostFor opencl-pro on default amdgpu and mesa you just need 5 files from pro driver(3 libs, 1 symlink and icd config file)
Luxmark is really fast, the theoretical processing power in FLOPS is very close to the real results, in other words: R9 290X = GTX 1070! With the two tests mentioned in the article and got 7497/15903 points with Hawaii. The hotel scene seems even better with 2982 pts.
However, Blender Cycles is still slow. I need 1:40 minutes for the BMW test scene, on Windows it is done in 1:00. I'm looking forward to OpenCL on ROC and wonder, if we can get clear performance improvements...
Comment
-
juno I installed Windows 10 today and tried testing OpenCL there, it's broken for me. With current Blender (2.78a) the kernel build just fails, but this issue got resolved in blender git. But there it just renders the environment color, so the driver is bugged. It was like this with 16.6, then not with 16.7, then it's like this again with the latest drivers/fixes.
I have the same performance on Linux and Windows rendering with OpenCL. My 270X takes 2:10 minutes to render the BMW scene, and my CPU (FX 6300) takes 6:30 mins.
Comment
Comment