Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AMD RadeonSI Gallium3D Is Now Incredibly Close To OpenGL 4.3!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • geearf
    replied
    Originally posted by Nille_kungen View Post
    RadeonSI is OpenGL 4.3
    I don't think that'll be completely true until the above bug will be solved.
    For now you'll still need the override.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nille_kungen
    replied
    RadeonSI is OpenGL 4.3 and OpenGL ES 3.1 now

    Leave a comment:


  • haagch
    replied
    Bug report about the unreal engine situation: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95005

    Leave a comment:


  • Amarildo
    replied
    Originally posted by smitty3268 View Post

    Because compatibility.

    Google opengl compatibility vs core profile.
    Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • smitty3268
    replied
    Originally posted by Amarildo View Post

    It seems I have 4.1, but why "OpenGL version string" says 3.0?

    Code:
    [amarildo@amarildo ~]$ glxinfo | grep OpenGL
    OpenGL vendor string: X.Org
    OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD PITCAIRN (DRM 2.43.0, LLVM 3.7.1)
    OpenGL core profile version string: 4.1 (Core Profile) Mesa 11.2.0
    OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 4.10
    OpenGL core profile context flags: (none)
    OpenGL core profile profile mask: core profile
    OpenGL core profile extensions:
    OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 11.2.0
    OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30
    OpenGL context flags: (none)
    OpenGL extensions:
    OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.0 Mesa 11.2.0
    OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES 3.00
    OpenGL ES profile extensions:
    Because compatibility.

    Google opengl compatibility vs core profile.

    Leave a comment:


  • smitty3268
    replied
    Originally posted by pal666 View Post
    gl4.5 predates gles3.2, so it couldn't require it.
    It doesn't require all of it, but parts of gles3.2 are in the GL 4.5-based 3_1_compat extension. Even though it's named 3.1 and not 3.2.

    Leave a comment:


  • pal666
    replied
    Originally posted by smitty3268 View Post
    Although i guess he said that was for GLES3.2 - not sure which bits are required for the GL4.5 extension and which ones aren't.
    gl4.5 predates gles3.2, so it couldn't require it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Amarildo
    replied
    Originally posted by Tomin View Post

    Are you sure you checked the core profiile version and not just compatibility profile version?
    It seems I have 4.1, but why "OpenGL version string" says 3.0?

    Code:
    [amarildo@amarildo ~]$ glxinfo | grep OpenGL
    OpenGL vendor string: X.Org
    OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD PITCAIRN (DRM 2.43.0, LLVM 3.7.1)
    OpenGL core profile version string: 4.1 (Core Profile) Mesa 11.2.0
    OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 4.10
    OpenGL core profile context flags: (none)
    OpenGL core profile profile mask: core profile
    OpenGL core profile extensions:
    OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 11.2.0
    OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30
    OpenGL context flags: (none)
    OpenGL extensions:
    OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.0 Mesa 11.2.0
    OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES 3.00
    OpenGL ES profile extensions:

    Leave a comment:


  • Tomin
    replied
    Originally posted by Amarildo View Post
    How come I only have OpenGL 3 on Arch and AMD R9 270X? I'm using Mesa 11.2 and "radeon" as my driver.
    Are you sure you checked the core profiile version and not just compatibility profile version?

    Leave a comment:


  • Amarildo
    replied
    How come I only have OpenGL 3 on Arch and AMD R9 270X? I'm using Mesa 11.2 and "radeon" as my driver.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X