Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AMD Linux Graphics: The Latest Open-Source RadeonSI Driver Moves On To Smacking Catalyst

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dungeon
    replied
    Originally posted by Ancurio View Post

    Well that's not too hard is it? Someone just needs to run it through apitrace on fglrx, and it should reveal exactly what the game is doing.
    There is no difference, beside that usual midshader dissalowed.

    Better if someone can made video with render comparision with fglrx and radeon, and why not even nvidia... because if this is true that R9 290 with opensource driver matches GTX 980 with nvidia driver, this should be news which does not happen every day - maybe that will be first time we smashed that green blob

    But yeah it is very hard to believe without further approval

    Leave a comment:


  • Ancurio
    replied
    Originally posted by marek View Post
    whitecat: I'm sure Valley doesn't use tessellation, but I don't know if it uses a compute shader. The log only tells us what the engine "can" use, not what the engine is using.
    Well that's not too hard is it? Someone just needs to run it through apitrace on fglrx, and it should reveal exactly what the game is doing.

    Leave a comment:


  • darkcoder
    replied
    If that work and performance keep improving I think my idea of ditching AMD will go away. A 4 GB R9 290 may look as a nice upgrade over my 2GB 7870

    Leave a comment:


  • duby229
    replied
    Originally posted by dungeon View Post



    Or maybe this is all about that some things behave weird on Skylake?
    Yeah, I wonder what's up with that. There has to be some explanation that makes sense. Some cause that can be described. It doesn't seem like Skylake or Broadwell are stable.
    Last edited by duby229; 01 September 2015, 06:21 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheOne
    replied
    Originally posted by Linuxhippy View Post
    I still remember the times when Michael didn't miss any opportunity to point out (=bash) how horrible and useless the open-source drivers are.
    Maybe that motivated opensource driver developers to improve them....

    Leave a comment:


  • Linuxhippy
    replied
    I still remember the times when Michael didn't miss any opportunity to point out (=bash) how horrible and useless the open-source drivers are.

    Leave a comment:


  • dungeon
    replied
    I guess next time will be that there was rendering regression in mesa article

    Those R9 290 results in Valley looks like in line with GTX 980... Can you Michael write article how opensource radeon driver smashed nvidia driver

    Originally I was going to use the latest Catalyst 15.7 driver release, but its kernel module was running into issues on this Intel Skylake-based system used for testing on Ubuntu 15.04. Thus I resorted to using the packaged fglrx 15.20.2 / OpenGL 4.4.13374 OpenGL driver as packaged in Ubuntu Vivid that would play fine with the Skylake system running Ubuntu with the Xfce desktop.
    Or maybe this is all about that some things behave weird on Skylake?
    Last edited by dungeon; 01 September 2015, 05:47 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • marek
    replied
    Originally posted by whitecat View Post
    I never enabled any drirc config when running Unigine benchmarks. Should I ? I mean, is that mandatory in order to expect having a "normal" behavior with these benchmarks ?
    The benchmarks just don't work without drirc.

    Leave a comment:


  • gens
    replied
    so that's decided
    my next card will be a radeon

    Leave a comment:


  • jakubo
    replied
    IIRC the catalyst driver had some kind of limit in some cases (see catalyst vs nVidia comparisons). maybe RadeonSI will now remove it.
    on another note: there will come the benefits from kernel scheduler and graphics scheduler on top??? that would be incredibly neat!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X