I have been expecting some performance improvement for the r600 driver and then I saw this :/ R600 needs to receive some performance love from the devs before they will decide to stop actively supporting it, supposing they haven't yet done.
AMD RadeonSI & R600g Gallium3D Tests On Mesa 11.0 + DRM-Next
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Michael View Post
It was a release build; optimizations enabled, assertions disabled.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by dungeon View PostApply this patch to rc1 and retest againIt is known one and will be in rc2:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mes...bab900006648aa
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by dungeon View PostApply this patch to rc1 and retest againIt is known one and will be in rc2:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mes...bab900006648aa
BTW generally that mesa 11 + llvm 3.8-git does not make sense to meReally, you want RC of all (mesa 11 and llvm 3.7) or git heads of all
## VGA ##
AMD: X1950XTX, HD3870, HD5870
Intel: GMA45, HD3000 (Core i5 2500K)
Comment
-
-
Unfortunately Linuxbenchmarking is simply useless in its current state for a number of reasons which I can't explain right now. I'm thinking about building my own to (seriously) test amdgpu resgressions on a per-commit base if Michael is willing to help me to setup the Phoromatic server plus making the needed modifications to the suite. Costs will be a problem of course, but I guess there are enough people willing to donate to cover expenses.Last edited by darkbasic; 28 August 2015, 04:53 AM.## VGA ##
AMD: X1950XTX, HD3870, HD5870
Intel: GMA45, HD3000 (Core i5 2500K)
Comment
-
-
The results don't surprise me. I recently tried mesa 10.5 + llvm 3.5 on my HD 7970M.
Here are a few screenshots with a few GALLIUM_HUD graphs enabled: https://imgur.com/a/GrwtL
Here are a few screenshots with mesa git + llvm svn from a few days ago (without SI scheduler patch): https://imgur.com/a/kmMKD
I'm not completely sure because the units are different, but I think the buffer wait times were lower with mesa 10.5 and the gpu usage (load) was better (higher) with mesa 10.5.
Michael is there any chance to include information like this in the phoronix test suite tests so that more parameters can be compared?
Does mesa support printing the GALLIUM_HUD info to the console or a log file, or does it only support displaying it in an overlay? If the first, how do developers feel about adding logging to a file or so?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by haagch View PostThe results don't surprise me. I recently tried mesa 10.5 + llvm 3.5 on my HD 7970M.
Michael is there any chance to include information like this in the phoronix test suite tests so that more parameters can be compared?
Does mesa support printing the GALLIUM_HUD info to the console or a log file, or does it only support displaying it in an overlay? If the first, how do developers feel about adding logging to a file or so?Michael Larabel
https://www.michaellarabel.com/
Comment
-
-
Hmm, btw... it's quite big omission there is no way to dump raw gallium hud data into file. I found HUD quite useful for getting idea what goes on, but sometimes I need to do automated/batch processing of this kind of data and Gallium HUD would not help with that. This is very sad, since it actually got most code and data in hand and it literally about being able to write it to some file.
Comment
-
Comment