Originally posted by agd5f
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Tear-Free Acceleration For ATI EXA, Xv
Collapse
X
-
THe CS branch is basically a clean up and reorganization of the command submission code that was inherited from radeon. It's not specific to any particular chip.
Leave a comment:
-
At least there will be some R6xx/R7xx support already at the time the documents are being released. The CS-branch of RadeonHD looks like it'll be merged to master anytime now, too (can you comment on that one, bridgman?).
Leave a comment:
-
I think chances are good that this will be the one, but I don't want to sound too confident and jinx things. We've been a couple of weeks away for quite some time now
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bridgman View PostThe first two passes through IP review for 6xx/7xx documentation failed. I can't really go into the details because that would kinda defeat the purpose of keeping some stuff secret, but potential risks were raised which we did not have answers for at the time.
I believe we have worked through all of those issues now and I am going to kick off another review pass this week.or you think it will be possible that this time it will be ok?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rbmorse View PostThat's hard to predict. Depends on the issues, and whether, for example, there are things like third-party interests involved.
Some of these things can take a long time only to find they can't be fixed, especially where there is third-party involvement. I was involved in one where negotiations went on for a year before the other side decided they didn't want to play, during which our own project was on largely on hold pending resolution.
They offered an NDA that would have let us continue to develop pending resolution of release issues, but if we didn't get permission in the end that effort would have been lost and our devs tainted by exposure to the source so we declined and put the devs onto other projects. After awhile I got fired^h^h^h^hlaid off because without the project I didn't have a function.
It would have been cheaper to develop an independent solution, but the lawyers kept telling us an agreement with the other was imminent. I now believe they were just stringing us along in an attempt to get us to abandon the project. It worked.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lucky_ View PostHow long lasts one of these reviews ?
One week, one month ?
Some of these things can take a long time only to find they can't be fixed, especially where there is third-party involvement. I was involved in one where negotiations went on for a year before the other side decided they didn't want to play, during which our own project was on largely on hold pending resolution.
They offered an NDA that would have let us continue to develop pending resolution of release issues, but if we didn't get permission in the end that effort would have been lost and our devs tainted by exposure to the source so we declined and put the devs onto other projects. After awhile I got fired^h^h^h^hlaid off because without the project I didn't have a function.
It would have been cheaper to develop an independent solution, but the lawyers kept telling us an agreement with the other was imminent. I now believe they were just stringing us along in an attempt to get us to abandon the project. It worked.Last edited by rbmorse; 24 September 2008, 10:33 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bridgman View PostThe first two passes through IP review for 6xx/7xx documentation failed. I can't really go into the details because that would kinda defeat the purpose of keeping some stuff secret, but potential risks were raised which we did not have answers for at the time.
I believe we have worked through all of those issues now and I am going to kick off another review pass this week.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bridgman View PostThe first two passes through IP review for 6xx/7xx documentation failed. I can't really go into the details because that would kinda defeat the purpose of keeping some stuff secret, but potential risks were raised which we did not have answers for at the time.
I believe we have worked through all of those issues now and I am going to kick off another review pass this week.
One week, one month ?
Leave a comment:
-
The first two passes through IP review for 6xx/7xx documentation failed. I can't really go into the details because that would kinda defeat the purpose of keeping some stuff secret, but potential risks were raised which we did not have answers for at the time.
I believe we have worked through all of those issues now and I am going to kick off another review pass this week.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: