Originally posted by dungeon
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AMD Is Still Moving Towards A Unified Open-Source Driver
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by schmidtbag View PostFor my HD5750s, I actually get better overall performance from the open source drivers. Frame rates technically might be lower at times, but the image is still smoother. AM1 doesn't have much grunt to it, so any features the FOSS drivers lack couldn't effectively be used on the GPU to begin with. That being said, any additional features you gain in catalyst mostly go to waste, and catalyst (in byte size) is huge in comparison. At the very least, the greatest disadvantage to catalyst (in my experience) is video playback. My overclocked FX-6300 and HD5750 struggle to play fullscreen 720p videos with vsync disabled. But with the FOSS drivers I can play 1080p with vsync and my CPU usage is low and my fans remain quiet..
Yes i also use radeon of course, but few times i tried Catalyst it works fine at least for meLast edited by dungeon; 29 September 2014, 12:56 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by killerbot View PostHi,
I was wondering if legacy GPU (HD 4xxx) will also benefit from this strategy ?
Thanks
In practice, I would guess no for the following reasons.- The older cards have a different achitecture, which would require more work to support.
- The open source driver is on par with the performance the old binary driver achieved.
- The open source driver now supports pretty much everything the legacy cards can handle (openGL 3.3). With the exemption of opencl.
So if I had to bet, I would guess no.
Comment
Comment