Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AMD Radeon R9 290: Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Drivers
Collapse
X
-
About 40 fps, 30 fps in the most difficult scenes. The framerate wasn't particularly high but it was quite smooth and a more than enjoyable experience overall.
-
Originally posted by darkbasic View PostIt depends: I played Metro 2033 Last Light @2560x1600 with Maxed out settings with radeonsi.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by verde View PostGallium3D drivers are simply not acceptable for gaming. I feel lucky that my desktop hardware is nVidia with PROPER support. At my HTPC (Ati 2600 GPU) I ended up with Windows to revive my GPU potential.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by verde View PostI am not talking about Humble Indie Bundle. And expressing your experience doesn't make you "act like you own" something.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Michael View PostFor people that want to see just how the performance compares against Catalyst...
if you do catalyst comparison you should at least use card that works as it should. then include non working ones as it will give better grasp of current situation and what to buy
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Hamish Wilson View PostSo I am not supposed to be gaming with a Gallium3D driver on an old R700 GPU then?
Because I am, and it works. Gaming covers a lot. Do not act like you own it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by verde View PostGallium3D drivers are simply not acceptable for gaming.
Because I am, and it works. Gaming covers a lot. Do not act like you own it.
Leave a comment:
-
Gallium3D drivers are simply not acceptable for gaming. I feel lucky that my desktop hardware is nVidia with PROPER support. At my HTPC (Ati 2600 GPU) I ended up with Windows to revive my GPU potential.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: