Originally posted by Espionage724
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AMD Releases UVD Video Decode Support For R600 GPUs
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Nille View PostThe last makes me really really angry.
What? First there is no longer a fglrx Support and we have to use the foss-radeon driver and now this uncompleate foss driver is legacy too now?
MPEG2 only with shaders and no support for interlacing on R6xx style UVD
In practice i guess that means you can use for example:
mpv --hwdec=vdpau --vo=vdpau
mpv --hwdec=vdpau --vo=opengl
Comment
-
Originally posted by halfmanhalfamazing View PostThis is such great news! The to do list keeps getting smaller and smaller and smaller!
Now, if only they would prioritize Crossfire support and put together some sort of easy to use, updated configuration GUI, this driver would be perfect!
@Nuc!eoN
I understand your frustration, but in hindsight buying a DX10/OGL3 card in 2009 for linux purposes was a bad call. GPU drivers tend to be grouped by API generation, so since DX11 and OGL4 were just around the corner (actually weren't both released in 2009?), buying hardware supporting last-generation technology is always bound to get ditched relatively soon. I do feel that when AMD decided to categorize the HD4000 series as legacy, it was a little too soon, but, R600 goes all the way back to 2006.
So the moral of the story is if you're going to buy a GPU and expect long-term results, don't buy the last generation of the current architecture. As an owner of two HD5750s, there's a good chance that DX12 and OGL-Next won't work on my hardware. Support for my hardware on Catalyst is most likely going to be dropped shortly after AMD releases their first GPU with official DX12 and OGL-Next support (official meaning that even the boxes will label it). Support for the R600 open source drivers is already slowing down (compared to Radeon SI). The annoying part is by the time I feel the need to upgrade my GPUs, everything I'll have wanted out of the open source drivers will be completed.Last edited by schmidtbag; 24 August 2014, 10:56 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by schmidtbag View PostI do feel that when AMD decided to categorize the HD4000 series as legacy, it was a little too soon, but, R600 goes all the way back to 2006.
That way i also expect somewhere next year (maybe even in early spring) HD5xxx/HD6xxx will be also legacy and only GCN+ supported with the fglrx driver, etc... so according to the history if that does not happen next year i will be surprised .Last edited by dungeon; 24 August 2014, 11:37 PM.
Comment
-
Not everyone can spend $200 on video cards
Originally posted by opensource View PostAMD and other devs, if developing for older hardware does not help support new hardware then please don't waste your time writing code for old hardware. New and newer hardware has more users and new hardware is also faster/better. Get over it and sell your old hardware and buy new hardware (200$ extra per 3years is nothing). Intel has great open source drivers BTW, they even have a team called The Intel Open Source Technology Center. Unfortunately they don't have AM/NV like graphics cards but regarding CPU I'd buy Intel.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nuc!eoN View PostThey also made clear that there will be no Windows 8 support.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kano View Postxbmc support it is really poor.
The problem is simple (they create a new decoder before close the old one)
It would not surprise me if the xbmc do the same on linux, but the hardware that can only decode on stream at the same time was not supported since now
Comment
Comment