Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AMD "Hawaii" Open-Source GPU Acceleration Still Not Working Right

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • _SXX_
    replied
    Originally posted by smitty3268 View Post
    It's hard to see the first 2 posts here as anything other than trolls.
    ...
    Are we supposed to take something useful out of that? Because i sure can't.
    Clearly useless posts, but I'm AMD and open source drivers user and I can't argue with fact that Catalyst is crap.

    Statement like "both latest amd and nvidia cards work *now* with their blobs." aren't true and it's what I posted about above. 290 and 290X is waste of money with Catalyst on Linux because performance is unacceptable low compared to Windows driver.

    PS: And yeah I'm really confused about GPU generation naming/versioning...

    Leave a comment:


  • _SXX_
    replied
    Originally posted by smitty3268 View Post
    Volcanic Islands hasn't come out yet, that's the next gen.
    Hell. Why do every press site call 290 as "Volcanic Islands" then?

    Leave a comment:


  • smitty3268
    replied
    Originally posted by _SXX_ View Post
    So I seen this news and it's message I can read: hey AMD, fix this! Unfortunately fanboys fail to see this and only see some "Nvidia trolls".
    It's hard to see the first 2 posts here as anything other than trolls.

    But, Catalyst isn't a piece of OpenGL support crap?
    get a refund and buy nvidia
    Are we supposed to take something useful out of that? Because i sure can't.

    Leave a comment:


  • metalliax
    replied
    Originally posted by Rakot View Post
    7790 is the first Sea Islands (GCN 2.0) GPU AFAIK.
    260/260x and 290/290x are both GCN 1.1 chips making them very similar. Also, Kaveri APUs are GCN 1.1.

    All the HD7xxx cards were GCN 1.0.

    As for GCN 2.0, rumor has it we'll see it in August w/ Tonga (mid-range).

    Leave a comment:


  • smitty3268
    replied
    Originally posted by _SXX_ View Post
    R9 290X / 290 was named as "Volcanic Islands" so I think they're different, but it's looks like both GCN 2.0 so I likely wrong here.
    Volcanic Islands hasn't come out yet, that's the next gen.

    7790, 260, and 290 are all Sea Islands.

    The rest of the SI cards (7xxx,270,280,etc.) were all Southern Islands. I think.

    Leave a comment:


  • _SXX_
    replied
    Originally posted by Rakot View Post
    Unfortunately it doesn't work like this. Alex, Bridgman and other developers can only see your post. But they do not make decisions. It seems more like attacking them.
    I'm not trying to attack devs there, but just agree with fact in this article: Hawaii support is broken.

    Originally posted by Rakot View Post
    Blame managers not developers.
    Phoronix is only website about Linux graphics so if "managers" read any it's this one.

    Originally posted by Rakot View Post
    7790 is the first Sea Islands (GCN 2.0) GPU AFAIK.
    R9 290X / 290 was named as "Volcanic Islands" so I think they're different, but it's looks like both GCN 2.0 so I likely wrong here.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rakot
    replied
    Originally posted by _SXX_ View Post
    Multiple hardware-related websites reported that R7 260X is a rebranded 7790 with unlocked audio part (TrueAudio). Fake?

    PS: They also have mostly the same result in benchmarks too.
    7790 is the first Sea Islands (GCN 2.0) GPU AFAIK.

    Leave a comment:


  • dungeon
    replied
    Originally posted by Kivada View Post
    No need, the docs are already there, there aren't that many Linux users using high end GPUs to put it on the high priority list. Give it another year, Star Citizen, Metro Complete Pack, Civilization: Beyond Earth, Witcher 3 and whatever else gets announced will provide a need for a focus on the high end GPUs sold in the hundreds of thousands as well as the low and mid range that have sold in the millions.
    Of course that is somehow priority excuse because it does not work stright away , i don't believe in that (about numbers) story at all in the matter "chip can't work" and that is because of numbers... i mean that is funny to say and even more funnier who believe at that .

    It would work stright away, if it was no problem to implement right . Simply, devs still does not know why it does not work . Until someone figured out why .

    Leave a comment:


  • Rakot
    replied
    Originally posted by _SXX_ View Post
    Only Nvidia GPU I have it's some GT 430 and GeForce 210 that used in my home server for blob and nouveau testing. They working quite good for purposes low-end GPUs designed for, but Nvidia is not suitable for me (don't work with GPU passthrough).

    Only reason why I participate this topic it's because I want AMD to fix their driver and want to see more news on moving more resources towards proper driver. So I seen this news and it's message I can read: hey AMD, fix this! Unfortunately fanboys fail to see this and only see some "Nvidia trolls".
    Unfortunately it doesn't work like this. Alex, Bridgman and other developers can only see your post. But they do not make decisions. It seems more like attacking them. Blame managers not developers. As for devs, they are doing an awesome job! One year ago the only option was fglrx but now I completely switched to radeonsi and it works nicely!

    I bet the problem with this particular GPU could be a stupid typo somewhere in the code as was in a case with dpm on cayman (single line patch fixed a crash on it)...

    Leave a comment:


  • _SXX_
    replied
    Originally posted by agd5f View Post
    Not exactly. R7 260 and 260x are sea islands parts, same as hawaii.
    Multiple hardware-related websites reported that R7 260X is a rebranded 7790 with unlocked audio part (TrueAudio). Fake?

    PS: They also have mostly the same result in benchmarks too.
    Last edited by _SXX_; 21 July 2014, 09:16 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X