Originally posted by r_a_trip
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Marek Patches A "Mega Radeon" Driver
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by s3rg3 View PostI think this is a waste of time,working on optimization,or broken/non implemented function would be a better use of time.
Leave a comment:
-
I think this is a waste of time,working on optimization,or broken/non implemented function would be a better use of time.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PhoronixThat's over 18MB of disk space for supporting the three Radeon drivers
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rohcQaH View PostYeah. For someone who's capable of setting VIDEO_CARDS="r600", this change means that my driver is now 7 MB instead of 6 MB because it supports cards I don't have. I don't care about 1 MB on my hard drive, but 1 MB of RAM seems like a needless waste.
Doesn't look like there'll be an option to compile them separately though.
IOW, the filename will change, but if you only include r600, you will only get r600, no size increase.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Spittie View PostOh, c'mon, it's just 1MB. We don't live in the '90s anymoreOriginally posted by Spittie View PostThis is all about livecd, which are limited to ~700mb
What is more important, as I understand, is that mega-driver is also about security, isn't?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rohcQaH View PostYeah. For someone who's capable of setting VIDEO_CARDS="r600", this change means that my driver is now 7 MB instead of 6 MB because it supports cards I don't have. I don't care about 1 MB on my hard drive, but 1 MB of RAM seems like a needless waste.
Doesn't look like there'll be an option to compile them separately though.
Also Marek says that what's missing is mostly build-work, it's clear that he didn't bother adding an option to enable/disable the megadriver, but who wants to get it merged will have to.
Originally posted by mark_ View PostI'm asking myself why the distributions install every driver in the first place. I don't need Nvidia and intel (or matrox or S3) drivers if I am using an ATI card but nonetheless they are installed. And if I try to remove them, the packaging software probably wants to remove all desktop and X11 packets because they "depend" on drivers I never use.
But instead of improving their shitty packagers and introducing a hardware detection at installation time - sure, let the upstreamers change everything to save some space (the Windows drivers also include everything for all cards and even a config interface with dependant libraries, who cares about 200MB drivers there?).
If they are so anal about package size, they probably want to shrink their kernel images from 30MB to 2MB first, then we'll talk again.
Removing the drivers from the default installation would save maybe ~30mb of disk space (and not improve ram usage, or speed), and remove one of the nicest features of Linux, which is the ability to take my hdd, plug it into any machine and have it working.
If you really want more control over what you get installed, then Gentoo is for that. Arch too, on a lesser level.
Leave a comment:
-
It is funny what is results of this, for example Debian linked all those i915_dri.so, i965_dri.so, nouveau_vieux.dri.so and radeon_dri.so to the one called r200_dri.so .
So in the end we have only one dri.so for all classics drivers and with this only one for the all gallium dri drivers .
So the best i think for those to just be called: mesa_dri.so and gallium_dri.soLast edited by dungeon; 15 May 2014, 05:42 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
@mark_
You likely know this already, but most users do not know what they need. If the default install does not show a screen, or only ships vesa, they will complain, instead of only installing the driver for their card.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: