"Ask ATI" dev thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aristar
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2009
    • 5

    Guys,

    I installed Catalist 9.6 on Ubuntu 9.04. When trying to run OpenGL apps on my ASUS P5E WS PRo with HD3650 I got an error below. My screen stopped responding. Actually I already tired a bit of my card. On Windows XP I had almost a daily SILENT restart because of "GXO failed to execute AtomBios".
    Looks like this is HW problem. If so - how to claim justify this to my supplier to exchange the card?


    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.520512] [fglrx] ASIC hang happened
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.520518] Pid: 4606, comm: vmware-vmx-debu Tainted: P 2.6.28-11-generic #42-Ubuntu
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.520520] Call Trace:
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.520569] [<ffffffffa010b019>] KCL_DEBUG_OsDump+0x9/0x10 [fglrx]
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.520609] [<ffffffffa011840c>] firegl_hardwareHangRecovery+0x1c/0x50 [fglrx]
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.520670] [<ffffffffa019a259>] ? _ZN4Asic9WaitUntil15ResetASICIfHungEv+0x9/0x10 [fglrx]
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.520730] [<ffffffffa019a20c>] ? _ZN4Asic9WaitUntil15WaitForCompleteEv+0x6c/0xb0 [fglrx]
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.520790] [<ffffffffa019928d>] ? _ZN4Asic19PM4ElapsedTimeStampERK23PM4_TS_INTERRUPT _PARAMSj14_LARGE_INTEGER+0x18d/0x1c0 [fglrx]
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.520833] [<ffffffffa0132cc2>] ? firegl_trace+0x72/0x1e0 [fglrx]
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.520894] [<ffffffffa0192062>] ? _ZN15QS_PRIVATE_CORE27multiVpuPM4ElapsedTimeStampE RK23PM4_TS_INTERRUPT_PARAMSj14_LARGE_INTEGER+0x32/0x50 [fglrx]
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.520951] [<ffffffffa018c193>] ? _Z19uQSTimeStampRetiredmjj14_LARGE_INTEGER+0xa3/0xb0 [fglrx]
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521008] [<ffffffffa0187f79>] ? _Z8uCWDDEQCmjjPvjS_+0x379/0x1080 [fglrx]
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521052] [<ffffffffa01350c8>] ? firegl_cmmqs_CWDDE_32+0x348/0x410 [fglrx]
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521095] [<ffffffffa0133b60>] ? firegl_cmmqs_CWDDE32+0x70/0x100 [fglrx]
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521101] [<ffffffff803f549c>] ? apparmor_capable+0x1c/0x70
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521143] [<ffffffffa0133af0>] ? firegl_cmmqs_CWDDE32+0x0/0x100 [fglrx]
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521182] [<ffffffffa0113fba>] ? firegl_ioctl+0x1ea/0x250 [fglrx]
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521219] [<ffffffffa0109311>] ? ip_firegl_ioctl+0x11/0x20 [fglrx]
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521223] [<ffffffff802f631d>] ? vfs_ioctl+0x7d/0xa0
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521226] [<ffffffff802f6685>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x75/0x230
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521229] [<ffffffff802f68d9>] ? sys_ioctl+0x99/0xa0
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521232] [<ffffffff802e82d8>] ? sys_read+0x88/0x90
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521236] [<ffffffff8021253a>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521239] pubdev:0xffffffffa0350a40, num of device:1 , name:fglrx, major 8, minor 62.
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521241] device 0 : 0xffff88012c0a8000 .
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521243] Asic ID:0x9598, revision:0x51, MMIOReg:0xffffc20010100000.
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521246] FB phys addr: 0xd0000000, MC :0xc0000000, Total FB size :0x20000000.
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521248] gart table MC:0xcfc2f000, Physical:0xdfc2f000, size:0x3d0000.
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521250] mc_node :FB, total 1 zones
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521252] MC start:0xc0000000, Physical:0xd0000000, size:0x10000000.
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521255] Mapped heap -- Offset:0x0, size:0xfc2f000, reference count:7, mapping count:0,
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521258] Mapped heap -- Offset:0x0, size:0x1000000, reference count:1, mapping count:0,
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521260] Mapped heap -- Offset:0xfc2f000, size:0x3d1000, reference count:1, mapping count:0,
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521262] mc_node :INV_FB, total 1 zones
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521264] MC start:0xd0000000, Physical:0xe0000000, size:0x10000000.
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521267] Mapped heap -- Offset:0xfffc000, size:0x4000, reference count:1, mapping count:0,
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521269] mc_node :GART_USWC, total 2 zones
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521270] MC start:0x3dc10000, Physical:0x0, size:0x4c170000.
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521273] Mapped heap -- Offset:0x3830000, size:0x800000, reference count:1, mapping count:0,
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521275] Mapped heap -- Offset:0x3030000, size:0x800000, reference count:1, mapping count:0,
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521278] Mapped heap -- Offset:0x2830000, size:0x800000, reference count:1, mapping count:0,
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521281] Mapped heap -- Offset:0x2030000, size:0x800000, reference count:2, mapping count:0,
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521283] Mapped heap -- Offset:0x30000, size:0x2000000, reference count:10, mapping count:0,
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521285] mc_node :GART_CACHEABLE, total 3 zones
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521287] MC start:0x10400000, Physical:0x0, size:0x2d810000.
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521289] Mapped heap -- Offset:0x0, size:0x200000, reference count:6, mapping count:0,
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521292] Mapped heap -- Offset:0xef000, size:0x11000, reference count:1, mapping count:0,
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521294] Dump the trace queue.
    Jun 16 03:18:18 hmsk kernel: [ 850.521295] End of dump
    -----------------------------------------------------------------

    Comment

    • RealNC
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2008
      • 4247

      And why do you post this here, in this thread?

      Comment

      • aristar
        Junior Member
        • Jun 2009
        • 5

        Because

        1. My card is fglrx device.
        2. Problem is widely announced and affects not only HD3650, but other HDXXXX cards. There is no clear answer yet how to deal with it. All recommendations to update drivers etc don't help.

        Comment

        • RealNC
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2008
          • 4247

          The whole forum section is for fglrx. If everyone was posting technical problems in this thread, we would have thousands of pages right now and there would be no need for an fglrx forum *section*.

          Make a new thread with your question.

          Comment

          • aristar
            Junior Member
            • Jun 2009
            • 5

            Thanks. Done http://phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?t=17737

            Comment

            • Mazur
              Junior Member
              • May 2009
              • 19

              #bridgman
              Can i ask you if ATI is going to ever support 2.6.29/2.6.30/2.6.31 kernel? Are you going to improve this driver or you are creating secret services on there? Size of this driver is increasing and increasing with every update, what is that? Ansii based Porn? I am asking because I cannot switch to nvidia and I see that you are the only one working there.

              Comment

              • cruiseoveride
                Senior Member
                • Jun 2008
                • 198

                linux-2.6.30 - 56.7Mb
                catalyst 9.6 - 90.0Mb

                Comment

                • Dark_Star
                  Phoronix Member
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 67

                  1. When will low end and onboard chips will get rid of vertical flickering problem ?
                  2. When will ATI Overdrive get a GUI ?
                  3. When we will have as good support as nvidia , as we still have no support for Mandriva | Arch Linux officially ? Also when they will deliver faster kernel support , the last I check was Catalyst 9.5 lacking kernel 2.6.29 support No idea abt 9.6

                  4. Lower end card just can't work with kwin composite it keeps on getting back and then all bad ;9

                  Comment

                  • bridgman
                    AMD Linux
                    • Oct 2007
                    • 13183

                    I don't recognize the problem you're describing in #1, can you provide some more information ?

                    Not sure about ATI overdrive plans; would a GUI actually get used much, ie how often do you actually interact with it ?

                    For the last year we have been allocating resources based on user feedback that said adding features (although you call them bug fixes ) is higher priority than early support for new kernels and xorg releases. I assume that once we have added enough new features the feedback from users will change and timely support for new kernels and xorg's will become a higher priority -- and then we'll spend less time on new features and more time on new kernel/xorg support.

                    Don't really understand 4 either... are there bugzilla tickets open for 1 and 4 (at ati.cchtml.com), and if so can you point me to the tickets ?
                    Last edited by bridgman; 22 June 2009, 10:52 PM.
                    Test signature

                    Comment

                    • Dark_Star
                      Phoronix Member
                      • Apr 2008
                      • 67

                      I have posted a thread http://phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?t=17106

                      my onboard ATI HD3300 works flawlessly in WIndows which I don't like to use and I don't have it installed atm ...But some HD1080p movies don't scale well and I get vertical distortion with any vide of any reso.

                      Well overclockers will be benefited with it.. and a easy gui with temps monitoring and all takes the burden of typing and grasping commands..

                      Not for 4 but yes I opened a bug at ati bugzilla which was never answered..

                      I will list to bug I posted about #4 as well https://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=49733

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X