"Ask ATI" dev thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • energyman
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2008
    • 1748

    how man r300 based pro cards with still valid support contracts are out there? if the number is 0 you know why it is not fixed.

    Comment

    • cruiseoveride
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2008
      • 198

      The only thing you guys should be using this thread for is consulting mental health. Its quite obvious there is a problem at ATi. Could be the water in the cafeteria? DONT DRINK THE WATER! IT WILL MAKE YOU DUMB!

      Comment

      • energyman
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2008
        • 1748

        yes, there is a problem. Luckily not everybody is using wine. I don't wine, I don't have problems.

        Comment

        • Xtigyro
          Junior Member
          • Oct 2008
          • 36

          OT:

          How much do THEY PAY YOU ? Is it enough to relieve your "non-open-community" soul ?

          Comment

          • gsmd
            Phoronix Member
            • Jul 2008
            • 50

            Dear ati devs, do you have any plans on supporting hardware decoding on 780g? If yes, how soon is this gonna happen?

            Comment

            • porksome
              Junior Member
              • Mar 2008
              • 7

              The question was never answered about support for r3** cards. I have an 9600 M10- worked with catalyst 8.9 but nothing since. OSS drivers are getting there but still a far cry performance wise compared to fglrx. I am running ubuntu 8.10 so can't use the 8.9 drivers due to xorg/xserver versions. I have a laptop which is hard to change in terms of graphics hardware.

              The release notes clearly state 9600 mobility is supported, but installation suggests otherwise. Has r3** support been officially dropped?

              Thanks

              Comment

              • bridgman
                AMD Linux
                • Oct 2007
                • 13183

                I didn't think we had changed anything w.r.t. R3xx/R4xx support. It's certainly possible that some ASICs got trimmed from the Ubuntu driver in order to meet schedule but I'm not aware of any general change in support.
                Test signature

                Comment

                • Kano
                  Kanotix Developer
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 7924

                  The problem with 8-9 to 8-11 is that you can not change res with nexuiz (from repository, I guess it would be the same with the sdl binary of the official package) on RV410. Try it and X will be corrupted until you kill nexuiz. I would not call say that nothing changed... beryl is not working too for Xorg 7.1.1 - it worked some time ago. fglrx drivers only get worse not better.

                  Comment

                  • Stormking
                    Junior Member
                    • Dec 2006
                    • 112

                    Originally posted by bridgman View Post
                    It's certainly possible that some ASICs got trimmed from the Ubuntu driver in order to meet schedule
                    The official 8.11 installer has the exact same bug as well. So I doubt it has anything to do with the "Ubuntu Special Edition" of fglrx.

                    Comment

                    • bridgman
                      AMD Linux
                      • Oct 2007
                      • 13183

                      Bug... ok, help me understand something. Are folks asking if we dropped 3xx/4xx from the driver because of something specific (removal of IDs etc..) or just because of a bug ?
                      Test signature

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X