Originally posted by _SXX_
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Likely Radeon Gallium3D Regression On Linux 3.14 + Mesa 10.2
Collapse
X
-
-
Michael, this is not completely from HyperZ and so still worth investigating. We have reports from Luke and dungeon on this forum that confirm there's another regression besides the intended hyperz change.
Luke specifically tested it, dungeon's case is media apps that do not use the Z buffer.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by _SXX_ View PostLooks like you talking about AMD Cataclysm.
Originally posted by _SXX_ View PostStable version that included in popular distributions usually missing important functionality. As long as I remember Geometry shaders for R600 won't be merged into 14.04 so what regular user should do, wait for 14.10? Or install Catalyst?Last edited by genstorm; 02 March 2014, 09:51 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jonty789 View PostAh i see thank you guys for your reply. Sorry i know i am noob lol but where do i put R600_DEBUG=hyperz in?
Do i just paste it in terminal?
Thank you guys
Leave a comment:
-
Ah i see thank you guys for your reply. Sorry i know i am noob lol but where do i put R600_DEBUG=hyperz in?
Do i just paste it in terminal?
Thank you guys
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by genstorm View PostHowever, between a non-bootable system, black screens, no X or simple graphics corruption, anything can happen.
Originally posted by genstorm View PostThat's why, given the choice, you simply don't advertise this to regular users. And you are wrong if you think the majority is doing it.
Stable version that included in popular distributions usually missing important functionality. As long as I remember Geometry shaders for R600 won't be merged into 14.04 so what regular user should do, wait for 14.10? Or install Catalyst?
Leave a comment:
-
I beg to differ:
Originally posted by chrisr View PostThe sooner a regression is reported, the sooner it can be fixed.
Originally posted by chrisr View PostWhy *on Earth* should anyone wait for a "final" version to be released first
Remember when Michael bisected a regression in the kernel, then decided to _not_ disclose the bad commit until several days later?
Leave a comment:
-
People have to report the regression first!
Originally posted by genstorm View PostWhen they matter, e.g. in final versions, yes. Have YOU ever used software based on live sources? Regressions may happen on any commit, might be fixed in one of the following commits.
Thanks for noticing this, Michael.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by genstorm View PostThen, lucky you. I understand that people using AMD open source drivers have for a long time been used to running on the edge of only the latest versions of software, even from git, because of the huge backlog they had to clear until recently. For the several AMD boxen I happen to take care of, I did that myself, emerged recent versions, tested them, then handed over the system to its users if OK. However, between a non-bootable system, black screens, no X or simple graphics corruption, anything can happen. That's why, given the choice, you simply don't advertise this to regular users. And you are wrong if you think the majority is doing it.
Its more likely to get You into troubles. (And well. Clearing bad Mesa/kernel duo is as simple as using legacy kernel from Advanced options at boot time. Try that for Catalyst...)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by _SXX_ View PostI think mostly everybody who actually play games with open source drivers use Oibaf PPA or other sources with fresh Mesa as well as latest kernel. Also as games I mean not only SuperTuxKart or OpenTTD.
PS: I use those drivers from git for about a year and never get any serious glitch or GPU lockup because of that.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: