AMD Open-Sources VCE Video Encode Engine Code

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CrvenaZvezda
    Phoronix Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 83

    #11
    And this is why I stay with AMD for all my own computers. Yes, i would LOVE to have full OpenGL 4.4 support and super duper optimized code, but hey, at least AMD is moving in the right direction. Also doing so in an steadily increasing speed!

    Comment

    • Drago
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 799

      #12
      Originally posted by Redi44 View Post
      I'm glad that I chose the AMD HW in my two recent builds over the Intel HW
      Intel have supported video encoding via VA-API,
      for a long time now. Just for your information.

      Comment

      • profoundWHALE
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2013
        • 1199

        #13
        Originally posted by Drago View Post
        Intel have supported video encoding via VA-API,
        for a long time now. Just for your information.
        Yeah, I'm a little confused with people talking about AMD like they're the first to do it.

        Comment

        • pinguinpc
          Senior Member
          • Jun 2009
          • 918

          #14
          Good for AMD, another year maybe GCN opensource driver stay on more mature state

          Respect VCE code is very good, for example if simplescreen recorder support this, linux screencasting users appreciate that

          Comment

          • Figueiredo
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2011
            • 211

            #15
            Originally posted by agd5f View Post
            You can use VCE to encode to your own h.264/mpeg videos or in combination with UVD to transcode videos.
            Christian, could you elaborate a little abou the flexibility of these blocks (UVD and VCE)? For example, is VCE only usefull for H.264? Could it be eventually used for other codecs, even if only partially?

            What about true audio? Is there any plant to support it on the open driver?

            Comment

            • chithanh
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2008
              • 2492

              #16
              Heh, that was so unexpected that there is not even an entry in http://wiki.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature/ for Video Encode with VCE
              Originally posted by Figueiredo View Post
              Christian, could you elaborate a little abou the flexibility of these blocks (UVD and VCE)? For example, is VCE only usefull for H.264? Could it be eventually used for other codecs, even if only partially?
              Looks like it supports only H.264 output from page 10 of AMD's UVD3 whitepaper: http://www.amd.com/us/Documents/UVD3_whitepaper.pdf
              Last edited by chithanh; 04 February 2014, 01:31 PM.

              Comment

              • Redi44
                Senior Member
                • Jul 2012
                • 235

                #17
                Originally posted by Drago View Post
                Intel have supported video encoding via VA-API,
                for a long time now. Just for your information.
                I know. My post wasn't only about this but rather about the quite nice support AMD gives us lately...

                Comment

                • oleid
                  Senior Member
                  • Sep 2007
                  • 2473

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Drago View Post
                  Intel have supported video encoding via VA-API,
                  for a long time now. Just for your information.
                  What software supports encoding via vaapi? I didn't find any so far...

                  Comment

                  • entropy
                    Senior Member
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 1131

                    #19
                    @AMD staff

                    Some years ago Bridgman said the development department is looking to disentangle
                    the decoding units from the DRM blocks in order to make it easier (read less dangerous)
                    to release programming documentation.

                    Do current ASICs already profit from that "decision" or is this still in the pipeline (or even not pursued anymore)?

                    Comment

                    • agd5f
                      AMD Graphics Driver Developer
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 3939

                      #20
                      Originally posted by entropy View Post
                      @AMD staff

                      Some years ago Bridgman said the development department is looking to disentangle
                      the decoding units from the DRM blocks in order to make it easier (read less dangerous)
                      to release programming documentation.

                      Do current ASICs already profit from that "decision" or is this still in the pipeline (or even not pursued anymore)?
                      We are already taking advantage of it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X