AMD Catalyst 12.6 Beta improvements?

[hobbes]

AMD took down 12.6 beta from the website.

Is there anyone here that could provide us a link to it?

Thanks

[rechapit]

Hey guys,

we (Debian) just wanted to upload the fixed xserver 1.12 driver to Debian, but yeah the x 1.12 support is....:

Backtrace:
0: /usr/bin/X (xorg_backtrace+0x34) [0x7fbbe05283c4]
1: /usr/bin/X (0x7fbbe03a0000+0x18bf99) [0x7fbbe052bf99]
2: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x7fbbdf6c8000+0xf030)
[0x7fbbdf6d7030]
3: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpciaccess.so.0 (0x7fbbdf8e4000+0x5394)
[0x7fbbdf8e9394]
4: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so (0x7fbbdb7bb000+0x8032c9)
[0x7fbbdbfbe2c9]
5: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so
(amd_xs112_int10_xf86ExtendedInitInt10+0xdd) [0x7fbbdbfbe05d]
6: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so
(amd_xs112_int10_xf86InitInt10+0xb) [0x7fbbdbfbd8fb]
7: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so (xf86InitInt10+0xd)
[0x7fbbdbb0397d]
8: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so (0x7fbbdb7bb000+0x48405c)
[0x7fbbdbc3f05c]
9: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so
(xdl_xs112_PreInitAdapter+0x274) [0x7fbbdbc3ec34]
10: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so
(xdl_xs112_atiddxPreInit+0x12ad) [0x7fbbdbc4031d]
11: /usr/bin/X (InitOutput+0x83c) [0x7fbbe043287c]
12: /usr/bin/X (0x7fbbe03a0000+0x4181d) [0x7fbbe03e181d]
13: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (__libc_start_main+0xfd)
[0x7fbbde3f1ead]
14: /usr/bin/X (0x7fbbe03a0000+0x41cdd) [0x7fbbe03e1cdd]
Segmentation fault at address 0xffffffffe18c7332

... simply not working at all (on amd64 only maybe?)..............

Having the same issue. posted a bug report here

[acer]

So, they fix the 2d problem and leave hd4xxx users in the dust? nice.

[nadro]

It looks like AMD drop support for HD2k-4k in the same time, when he released the best drivers since last years...

[vitorgatti]

Replace control file: http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Ubu...ware_Watermark
And put valid signature to signature file: http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Amd_watermark

Didn't work. I can't remove the watermark saying "AMD Testing use only".
It seems that there is no signature inside the driver install script.

Anybody managed to remove/hide it?

Thanks

[mikejuni]

Replace control file: http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Ubu...ware_Watermark
And put valid signature to signature file: http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Amd_watermark

It doesn't work. The signature is "Undefined" in the signature file.

[RussianNeuroMancer]

It doesn't work. The signature is "Undefined" in the signature file.

That why you need to put valid signature follow instruction.

[mikejuni]

That why you need to put valid signature follow instruction.

Further checked the signature from the grep command returns unsigned and the control file from install archive is the same as the installed one.

[RussianNeuroMancer]

Further checked the signature from the grep command returns unsigned and the control file from install archive is the same as the installed one.

Take control file and signature from stable build, not beta.

[xgt001]

can confirm works well with Xserver 1.12 on Archlinux

Having the same issue. posted a bug report here

here is my xorg.0.log... i just updated the packages after installing Catalyst 12.6 from the AUR....looks like debian specific issue to me