Originally posted by yoshi314
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Avivo Linux R500 Driver v0.1.0 Coming
Collapse
X
-
-
There are other bottleneck like some GL stuff which are not handled well enough currently (enemy territory use some of this). Anyway there is work underway to address most of pitfall of current open source driver. What is hard is that we need to keep backward compatibility so we endup doing crazy things just to make sure we do not break old things (new drm should work with new Xserver, new Xserver should work with old drm, new dri driver should work with old drm, ...).
is it mostly guesswork, or are there actual tools for the job?
While the glass may not be full of water, there is a water truck on the away.
edit:
on the away.Last edited by yoshi314; 23 July 2007, 09:31 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by yoshi314 View Posti wonder who's primarily to blame for poor gfx performance on better cards - driver programmers, hw engineers, or perhaps linux kernel hackers?
Leave a comment:
-
The guys that don't want more driver developers because they cost money.
Leave a comment:
-
What I mean is that GF8 has not the full performance on Linux at the moment, so AMD could beat nVidia.
Leave a comment:
-
And when the truck arrives, it may has overhauled the competition.
Okay that's enough. It sounds philosophic and I don't like that. What I mean is that GF8 has not the full performance on Linux at the moment, so AMD could beat nVidia. That would be funny cause people would laugh at you if you would tell them that your fglrx driver is faster then the nvidia driver.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by hdas View Post
Meanwhile, XGL does work fine and stable with fglrx (no 3d of course). Even on a modest radeon 200m, its pretty good. On another note, the image quality of fglrx drivers is pretty good
and Xgl is quite dead as codebase too iirc. Other than showing of beryl (and hoping) Xgl is no good.
There really is no point in trying to see the glass as half full, we all know it's nearly empty.
imho.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by hdas View PostPS : After seeing the gtkperf benchmark (never heard of it before , I installed it and was happy to see it giving 160 seconds on the geforce 7400 go in my notebook . Btw - were the tests performed in that same small default window or full screen ?
Leave a comment:
-
Aside, its not just Linux, ATI's performance in OSX is equally horrible . My sister has a iMac with a x1600, on which doom3 @640x480 gives about 50 fps in OSX, a little better in linux (55fps or so, and a little smoother too - it feels like fps is capped or something ;-)
just a random thought.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: