Originally posted by blackiwid
View Post
Companies like Canonical are far more evil than Novell:
Canonical contributes almost nothing, and its own Ubuntu centric projects rape the spirit of Opensource.
Which distribution do you think is the more importent for novell? the one they make money with or the one where they make no money? If they find some bugs, which distro will the first fix?
I meant primary the tools, because I dont want to directly modify the etc files most of the time. But I do not want such grafical tool. I mean stuff like update-grub ... in ubuntu its always update... you can like more to edit all the configs manualy or using that monster-tool yast, good for you
thats simple not true, its almost absurd, because in ubuntu (standard) are no unfree binary only (propriatary) tools, and they did surely not hardcoded configs in binarys or something like that. You have maybe no simple tool like yast that has this setting, but there are distro-independent tools for that like gdmsetup.
I would like to point out one more thing. Somewhere above you wrote:
defaults (directory structure etc) is bad.
Comment