AMD ROCm 6.3 Tags Begin Appearing On GitHub

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • lonedd
    replied
    Ehhm...to all people complaining about not being able to install it properly, why don't you guys just use the official Docker Images? Everything already preinstalled including pytorch etc. and also the run command is available, literally ~10min (depending on DL speed) of work and it's done.

    Leave a comment:


  • LumielGR
    replied
    Hopefully no more changes from AMD, last one was amdgpu libdrm at 05-Dec-2024 01:47 - I've pushed opencl-amd 6.3.0 for Arch Linux

    Leave a comment:


  • JRepin
    replied
    I wish they were using Open Build Service to build packages for many more GNU/Linux distributions, the normal popula ones.

    Leave a comment:


  • LumielGR
    replied
    Originally posted by Dukenukemx View Post
    Maybe the AUR has one that does it automatically?
    There are official packages for Arch Linux (rocm-hip-sdk, rocm-opencl-sdk) and there is also a pre-built version on AUR (opencl-amd, opencl-amd-dev) - which I'm maintaining. But as I said 6.3.0 has not been properly released yet.

    Leave a comment:


  • LumielGR
    replied
    The release is still a mess, like the previous one. Files are missing, no release notes available, and it has been re-released today. I assume the repository has been set as visible by accident again.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dnonmi
    replied
    Originally posted by Dnonmi View Post
    Over 4 years of negative experiences and eternal waiting, what are *******

    Said "negative stuff" started many years ago. And it's on AMD, no one else.
    Apparently the post is unapproved.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dnonmi
    replied
    Originally posted by NeoMorpheus View Post
    And we made it to 4 comments before the negative shit started.

    Never fails after every ROCm article is published.
    Over 4 years of negative experiences and eternal waiting, what are you on about?
    Said "negative sh**" started many years ago. And it's on AMD, no one else.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dukenukemx
    replied
    Originally posted by Jabberwocky View Post

    (Didn't see lem79's response before posting)

    According to the docs you can use "--no-dkms" option to skip the driver. I've seen people on reddit using "amdgpu-install --no-dkms --usecase=opencl" for example. Not sure which other parts of ROCm still works without the driver.

    See: https://rocm.docs.amd.com/projects/i...u-install.html
    Didn't realize there was a "--no-dkms" option. I'm running a Ryzen 5700X with a Radeon 6700 XT and currently using Linux Mint with Xanmod kernel, but I ordered a 2TB SSD and plan to switch over to CachyOS. Maybe the AUR has one that does it automatically?

    Leave a comment:


  • fitzie
    replied
    Originally posted by Dnonmi View Post
    Their lack of priority for Windows and lower tier card support is ridiculous. It's not about being Nvidia, it's about beating Nvidia.
    No wonder their stock is regressing, people are just tired of waiting.
    I think lack of support for lower tier is due to the RDNA/CDNA split, and the residual cost of adding lower tier support that people aren't using who are doing GPGPU. But the the UDNA future and the the trend towards running AI inference on clients will mean that ROCm or similar will probably become a standard part of the driver stack in the future.

    I'm very much exciting to replace my radeon VII with a 8800XT. That card is going to be a hit if it's comes out <= $650.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dnonmi
    replied
    Originally posted by NeoMorpheus View Post
    And we made it to 4 comments before the negative shit started.

    Never fails after every ROCm article is published.
    Over 4 years of negative experiences and eternal waiting, what are you on about?

    Said "negative shit" started many years ago. And it's on AMD, no one else.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X