Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Open-Source AMD Radeon Linux Graphics In Great Shape For Workstations, Handily Beating Proprietary Driver

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • agd5f
    replied
    Originally posted by Steffo View Post
    AMD should abandon their proprietary driver and invest their energy in the open source driver.
    There are two separate teams. We still need to support other OSes so not having a closed source driver on Linux does not suddenly free up a lot of resources to work on Linux. Windows still needs a driver.

    Leave a comment:


  • darkdragon-001
    replied
    Would be interesting to add Vulkan+Zink to the comparison

    Leave a comment:


  • Steffo
    replied
    AMD should abandon their proprietary driver and invest their energy in the open source driver.

    Leave a comment:


  • bridgman
    replied
    Originally posted by Lbibass View Post
    That’s embarrassing. I hope they can take some of the optimizations done on the open source side and use it in the windows drivers.
    In fairness, Marek put a lot of work into improving workstation app performance in the open source driver over the last couple of years. Without that I suspect AMDGPU-PRO might have been faster. Either way it's good to see.

    Leave a comment:


  • brucethemoose
    replied
    Originally posted by ms178 View Post
    Great job! Does that mean the proprietary driver can be phased out now? With the limited ressources available for AMD, I hope they might be able to better spend these elsewhere now...
    Yeah. I get why they have to maintain it short-term, but it does seem like a waste of very limited resources.

    Leave a comment:


  • ms178
    replied
    Great job! Does that mean the proprietary driver can be phased out now? With the limited ressources available for AMD, I hope they might be able to better spend these elsewhere now...

    Leave a comment:


  • Lbibass
    replied
    That’s embarrassing. I hope they can take some of the optimizations done on the open source side and use it in the windows drivers.

    AMD’s OpenGL is an embarrassment. Both Windows and Linux.

    Leave a comment:


  • brucethemoose
    replied
    Neat. I wonder if AMD could eventually use some of the RadeonSI code in Windows?


    At the risk of going off topic, I'd like to see some ROCM benchmarks from Phoronix if possible, ideally against an Nvidia RTX card running the proprietary drivers. PyTorch/TF performance will be a huge factor in my own buying decisions. The last time I had a AMD dGPU, I ragequit just trying to set rocm up, but it seems that the packaging has gotten *much* better now.

    Leave a comment:


  • Open-Source AMD Radeon Linux Graphics In Great Shape For Workstations, Handily Beating Proprietary Driver

    Phoronix: Open-Source AMD Radeon Linux Graphics In Great Shape For Workstations, Handily Beating Proprietary Driver

    With SPECViewPerf 2020 finally released for Linux I was curious to see how AMD's open-source "RadeonSI" Gallium3D driver within Mesa would compare to the performance offered by AMD's proprietary OpenGL Linux driver. After all, that longstanding proprietary driver, which is distributed as part of their Radeon Software for Linux driver package, has code in common with their Windows OpenGL driver and has previously been talked up as the preferred choice for workstation customers. Well, the latest open-source driver stack was outright kicking mud at that legacy binary blob for SPECViewPerf 2020 as well as the ParaView workstation visualization software.

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
Working...
X