Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Nearly Two Decades Later, ATI Radeon R300 Linux Driver Sees Occasional Improvement
Collapse
X
-
One question I've had: Why is there no EGL support in the r300 series? Does the OpenGL 2.1 hardware not actually support it, or has it just not been coded?
-
its nice to see that, but this cards is more to use in retro machines, new OS use a lot of resources and the cpu and hdd in this machines are quite slow. I remember when I change to a sdd many years ago, its a complete different experience and the best upgrade in any machine. I have a old ati 9600 and a athlon but the board burn and have o idea where I get one this days to test this old hardware in the new OS like xubuntu 32 bit, puppy or other 32 bits os since the cpu is only 32bits
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by M@GOid View PostI for one would like to force developers to run under-powered machines on a daily basis, so the brute force approach wasn't used so frequently to resolve bad code.
What I also see for OpenBSD in particular is that the additional security focus can often slow it down, so the developers have to focus on maintaining performance in other ways. In part, perhaps this is why its base install, including Xorg(fork) have stayed very light and unbloated. Just comparing their Xenocara with Xorg (i.e on FreeBSD or Linux) shows it consists of less dependencies but also offers the same (if not more) functionality. Fvwm and CWM are also great examples of balance of functionality vs weight.
It is not all perfect however. For example, I am not impressed by the current state of DEs for Linux/BSD. Most of the unworkable weight seems to come from these. I feel that older happens to be better here and the design of many packaging systems are unfortunately unsuitable for maintaining previous revisions of software effectively (I have only seen this work well(ish) on Solaris tbh).Last edited by kpedersen; 03 October 2021, 08:06 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
One problem with those hardware is that there are problems with AGP, PCI and PCIe graphics (see this thread from this year on LKML).
I have verified that:- AMD and Nvidia PCI Graphics are broken on AMD platforms, verified on K8, K10 and Piledriver architecture, including cards like ATI Radeon HD 4350 (RV710, TeraScale, GL 3.3, 512M VRAM, 1 HDMI + 1 VGA);
- AMD and Nvidia PCIe Graphics are broken on Intel platform also featuring an AGP port, verified on VIA PT880/VT82xx chipset, lots of cards tested, including cards like AMD Radeon HD 6970 (RV910 Caicos, TeraScale 3, OpenGL 4.3, 2GB VRAM, 2 DVI-I + 1 HDMI + 2 miniDP, released 2010-12);
- AMD AGP Graphics are broken on AMD and Intel platforms, lots of cards tested, including cadrs like ATI Radeon HD 4670 AGP (RV730 XT, TeraScale, GL 3.3, 1GB VRAM, 1 HDM + 1 DVI-I + 1 VGA);
Otherwise, the Mesa drivers are very good. This news is also about Mesa becoming even better for those old cards… But what if PCIe, PCI and AGP does not work to begin with when you align the unlucky combination of hardware?
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Huzzah for my still-used HP zv6000-series laptop with Ati Radeon Xpress 200M graphics (RS480 on the r300 driver)!
Edit: Running Ubuntu MATE 21.10 beta currently.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by M@GOid View PostI for one would like to force developers to run under-powered machines on a daily basis, so the brute force approach wasn't used so frequently to resolve bad code.
I wish some popular IDEs would automatically start doing that by default while the application is being ran to make developers a little more performance-aware.
- Likes 6
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MadCatX View PostVirtual reality, machine learning algorithms, networks capable of interconnecting billions of devices across the planet (and beyond), advanced data compression technologies for real-time streaming of high quality multimedia? You couldn't do any of than on an Amiga.
Machine learning is something you don't need anything special: if you have an ALU you can do it, even the old Amiga or intel 8086. Nowadays silicon manufacturers are just putting specialized instructions to accelerate that, but you don't really need anything special; that matter has been developed academically in the 70s.
About networks, TCP/IP has been developed in the 70s again, the protocol (IPv4) never really changed so much and IPv6 has yet to be widely adopted.
Things got speedier, but it is years we don't see great game-changing fundamental innovations in the field. Probably the next very big thing is quantum computing.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by M@GOid View PostNew OSes get bloated all the time, Linux included. Here I was testing a ancient C50 CPU and in recent versions of Ubuntu (above 18), Firefox 92 took over 20s to start, ON A SSD!! Opening the simple Wikipedia homepage took over 8 seconds. I decided to go back and discovered that on 14.04, Firefox 66 starts in 5 seconds and opens the page in half the time.
I for one would like to force developers to run under-powered machines on a daily basis, so the brute force approach wasn't used so frequently to resolve bad code.
Now the rant is over, I like to congratulate the devs helping to keep old and useful ATI/AMD hardware alive. Nvidia cards don't have the same driver longevity.
It's a horrible bloat.
Some tasks we did on the i486 are still quite the same, but now you need a Multi GHz Hexacore and GiBs of RAM.
Especially a lot of websites... just take some prefbar equivalent (was a Mozilla Suite/Seamonkey/FF addon), switch off JS and reload a page. Whoa! Fast! You actually feel the power of the HW.
Simply save a webpage. Say, 512 bytes of actual info, Kibibytes full of CSS, Megabytes of unrelated (!) images, and 1 - 5 MiB of JavaScript code. No wonder everything is slow.
On topic: Horray and Kudos for my heroes. I still have some R100 on a ThinClient and hope it'll also see some energy management love one day. I guess I lack R300 models, but I still got a bunch of R600 chips and cards around. And I'm always happy if people still take care for old HW. If it is still functional and isn't a heating plate (Netburst...) it's still okay to be used for the purpose.
- Likes 4
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by tildearrow View Post
Exactly this. AmigaOS, besides its "crashes are fatal" issue, was very capable, and that's on a humble 7MHz 68000.
On the other hand, Windows 10 takes long to boot on HDD..... on a 2.5GHz Core i5.
We used to have true innovations like accelerated rendering, memory protection, virtual memory, true color, 3D graphics... Now what?
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: