Originally posted by agd5f
View Post
Frankly speaking, if Intel wants to give him their next CPU along with $2000 and a list of tests they'd like ran to see where it stacks up....as long as the testing and reporting stays fair and open, the Phoronix way, what difference does it really make? I suppose a community contract with Michael or for companies that want to pay Michael might be a necessity. A vow of integrity; an agreement that all results will be published even if they're not the expected outcome; that Michael is allowed to have a negative opinions if a product doesn't live up to marketing and hype. Something along those lines.
Comment