i read somewhere about a guy who said he had worked for a while in nvidia or ati. he claimed that graphics drivers are written in such a way that makes them very difficult to maintan. the code is full of hacks, and often relies on undocumented platform quirks to behave faster.
wonder if that's what nvidia guy meant by driver being hard to write :]
also ati some time ago gave out a statement about opening the drivers - they said they would not because of something along the lines of "patented optimization algorithms" :] (i believe it was sometime around the time of amd's takeover).
Terry Makedon (AMD/ATI): "We can't open our drivers"
Collapse
X
-
I can understand not opening the Xxk series, but I would have thought the previous ones (X800, 9700 etc) could be opened with little competitive disadvantage. A lot of people run Linux with such cards, and would be appreciative of the full compatability when choosing their next card, even if it had lesser support.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by ivanovic View PostThe german newssite golem.de did have an interview with Terry Makedon, chief developer of graphics and chipset drivers for AMD/ATI. In short he did state the AMD/ATI will not open their drivers in the near future ("In the next six to twelve months this (opening the drivers) is not the road we will take") due to "proprietrary technics from 3rd party companies".
You can read the whole interview at golem.de, but keep in mind that it is in german, all statements I did qoute in here are translations from the german text: http://www.golem.de/0703/50995.html
IMO it is not necessary to open the existing drivers. I would already welcome if the specs for the cards were published. I don't think it will reveal any secrets when you tell someone in which register you have to write a value to achieve something. You can't tell me that these specs will really tell your competitors much about the internals of the hardware. Now I only got to hope for Intel releasing some add on card with free drivers since they seem to be the only real alternative...
Regardless of the aforementioned statement, Intel seems to be shaping up nicely all the same. I'm probably going to get one of the 965G motherboards shortly for testing work for LGP so I've got another reference platform (Maybe two- that way I can have an open one with the Intel Drivers and one that switch-hits between providing an NVidia and AMD PCI-E test machine. I'm really needing several upgrades since it's been a bit since my last cycle... )
If Larabee ends up being usable and they do the right thing (If the rumors are true, it'd be silly for them NOT to do the right thing for us and themselves at the same time...) it's going to get interesting real quick.Last edited by Svartalf; 12 March 2007, 12:35 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
-
For those of you who don't speak German:
he said that the Linux CCC is coming in 8.36 or 8.37.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Terry Makedon (AMD/ATI): "We can't open our drivers"
The german newssite golem.de did have an interview with Terry Makedon, chief developer of graphics and chipset drivers for AMD/ATI. In short he did state the AMD/ATI will not open their drivers in the near future ("In the next six to twelve months this (opening the drivers) is not the road we will take") due to "proprietrary technics from 3rd party companies".
You can read the whole interview at golem.de, but keep in mind that it is in german, all statements I did qoute in here are translations from the german text: http://www.golem.de/0703/50995.html
IMO it is not necessary to open the existing drivers. I would already welcome if the specs for the cards were published. I don't think it will reveal any secrets when you tell someone in which register you have to write a value to achieve something. You can't tell me that these specs will really tell your competitors much about the internals of the hardware. Now I only got to hope for Intel releasing some add on card with free drivers since they seem to be the only real alternative...Tags: None
-
Leave a comment: