Originally posted by SolidSteel144
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AMD R700 2D Driver Performance Comparison
Collapse
X
-
This is pretty much a one-time situation. It just so happened that EXA improvements were the most recent thing to show up in the released framework and the open driver can take advantage of them first.
Most of the upcoming framework improvements (memory management, Gallium etc..) will be complete non-issues since "all" they do is allow open drivers to get closer to closed drivers in terms of performance and features. I'm not trying to downplay them -- I think they are hugely important for the X community -- but the closed drivers have had similar capabilities for years.Last edited by bridgman; 25 January 2009, 04:58 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
That sounds almost like saying "Well you can have this driver and have good 2D performance, or have this driver and have good 3D performance". Doesn't sound ideal.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SolidSteel144 View PostMaybe the ATi developers should just contribute to the open source driver instead of their proprietary version.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by energyman View Postwell, gnome IS slow. There is no doubt about that. And compiz is pretty broken under its shiny surface so both make a less than ideal platform.
I didn't try 8.12 but a friend with a 48XX and I with my 3870 both tried gtkperf with the leaked 9.2 preview - and circles was fast for both of us.
Leave a comment:
-
Maybe the ATi developers should just contribute to the open source driver instead of their proprietary version.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by tmpdir View Post
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Enverex View PostThe fglrx driver sucks on that test and one of the other tests. I tried it myself on my HD4850 and it took a very long time.
Also don't bother with more comments like your last about Gnome, that is just pointless trolling.
I didn't try 8.12 but a friend with a 48XX and I with my 3870 both tried gtkperf with the leaked 9.2 preview - and circles was fast for both of us.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by llama View PostVery interesting results. Your conclusion is a little funny, though: The important thing isn't which driver won more benchmarks. It's which driver had big slowdowns that will be a bottleneck for some real-world activities and e.g. make firefox feel slow.
There were only a few cases where one driver was much slower than the other. IMHO, you should be focusing on those. e.g. Catalyst took 0.09s vs. radeonhd's 0.12s on GtkTextView scrolling. Text scrolling is definitely something that can make a desktop feel slow. e.g. server mobos with onboard mach64 chips suck so much with gnome-terminal that xterm is preferable. (Fortunately, the newer ATI E1000 chipset is up to par and can run a gnome desktop pretty well. No 3D accel, though, since the HW omits that functionality!)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by energyman View Postwell, gnome sucks anyway ....
thread=15059
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: