Originally posted by santiago
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How The RadeonSI Performance Has Evolved For Navi 10 Since Launch
Collapse
X
-
I found Navi firmware files here: https://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5..._ucode/navi10/
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shmerl View PostFor Debian testing/unstsable, just build latest libdrm yourself, build latest kernel and Mesa master. Then you should be good to go with Navi. Firmware package is already up to date:
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1049...into-unstable/
Code:$ dpkg -L firmware-amd-graphics | grep -i navi | wc -l 0
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DMJC View PostBasically outside of Debian Stretch/Ubuntu 18.04. The performance is 0% since the card doesn't work with X.org API Version 24. It only works with version 23. So it doesn't work in Debian Buster or Bullseye. Still waiting for a Mesa/X11 release with support for the card.
Leave a comment:
-
For Debian testing/unstsable, just build latest libdrm yourself, build latest kernel and Mesa master. Then you should be good to go with Navi. Firmware package is already up to date:
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DMJC View PostThe performance is 0% since the card doesn't work with X.org API Version 24. It only works with version 23.
Originally posted by DMJC View PostSo it doesn't work in Debian Buster or Bullseye. Still waiting for a Mesa/X11 release with support for the card.
The former seems very likely since AFAICS the Bullseye libraries are roughly same version as Buster's at the moment (too old to have Navi support until Bullseye picks up newer versions) but I'm not aware of a reason why either Buster or Bullseye could not be updated with sufficiently new kernel/mesa/firmware to run Navi well.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by phoronixIf looking at the geometric mean of these results from roughly three weeks ago to now, there is a slight advantage to the newest code overall.
Leave a comment:
-
Basically outside of Debian Stretch/Ubuntu 18.04. The performance is 0% since the card doesn't work with X.org API Version 24. It only works with version 23. So it doesn't work in Debian Buster or Bullseye. Still waiting for a Mesa/X11 release with support for the card.
Leave a comment:
-
If looking at the geometric mean of these results from roughly three weeks ago to now, there is a slight advantage to the newest code overall
Leave a comment:
-
There is a regression in LLVM that may have decreased performance. This might fix it:
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: