Originally posted by debianxfce
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Radeon Software Adrenalin 2019 Rolls Out While Linux Users Should Have AMDGPU-PRO 18.50
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Baguy View PostThis is great news, however on my RX 560 4G OC anything newer than mesa 18.0 runs like utter crap... all kinds of artifacts and tearing, leaving it basically impossible to use my system. (in particular KDE). Switched to AMD for a better experience, and honestly, i think the crap i had to deal with on my old nvidia card was better than this.
Comment
-
Originally posted by theriddick View PostYou can't use amdgpu and radeonsi at same time, that makes no sense, lol. You tell xorg to load one or the other.
AMDGPU is not AMDGPU-PRO, there is also the in development amdgpu-dc drivers.
(I don't care about case sensitivity for the sake of naming something, lets not be case nazi's)
I am not aware of any separate amdgpu-dc driver - dc is just the modern display part of the amdgpu driver. On pre-Vega chips we also have the older non-DC paths in the driver as backup but I imagine they will go away at some point.Last edited by bridgman; 14 December 2018, 12:53 PM.Test signature
Comment
-
Originally posted by Baguy View PostThis is great news, however on my RX 560 4G OC anything newer than mesa 18.0 runs like utter crap... all kinds of artifacts and tearing, leaving it basically impossible to use my system. (in particular KDE). Switched to AMD for a better experience, and honestly, i think the crap i had to deal with on my old nvidia card was better than this.
MSI rx 570 8GB passed through to Win10 via displayport also very good
Comment
-
Originally posted by M@yeulC View Post
robertpartridge , you have a few options:
* The "all-open" stack: radeonsi and radv
* The "all-closed" stack: AMDGPU-PRO
* Some hybrid of the two
Originally posted by M@yeulC View PostI would advise you to update to the most recent kernel and mesa you can (padoka ppa if using ubuntu, and maybe Linux 4.19.x) before installing your GPU. First, go with the all-open stack, and see if you have some specific needs that the proprietary driver can provide.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by mphuZ View PostSeriously? Is this all that AMD has been able to do for the whole year?
Neither the new roadmap, nor the AMDVLK community development, nor the Radeon Settings panel...
By all means, criticize sparse release notes. That's a legitimate complaint I can raise with management. But don't mistake sparse release notes for a lack of progress.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by twriter View Post
I don't understand comments like this. There are hundreds of articles at Phoronix about our open source contributions and driver releases throughout the year. The All-Open variant included in our AMDGPU-PRO packaged releases is built from the same source code as upstream, only packaged with a dkms module for convenient installation on LTS/enterprise Linux. AMDVLK is included, in addition to (closed source) AMDVLK PRO. Our packaged releases are necessary for some workstation users who require workstation features but you don't have to use them. We hope the All-Open variant is convenient for some All-Open users but there is nothing wrong with using Linux distro provided packages or the padoka ppa. Build from source, if you like, whatever floats your boat.
By all means, criticize sparse release notes. That's a legitimate complaint I can raise with management. But don't mistake sparse release notes for a lack of progress.
This year I expected AMD to talk about a new way to contribute to the AMDVLK driver, which will become easier and better.
It is worth considering that ROCm 2.0 is still not released - can something be told about Linux during this release? Last year, AMDVLK was told just a week after the Adrenalin Edition was released.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mphuZ View PostBut at the end of the year, AMD has recently tried to show something new for its users (like AMDVLK at the end of last year) on all platforms, as well as in the area of computing. This year I expected AMD to talk about a new way to contribute to the AMDVLK driver, which will become easier and better.
Goodies from the open source team often happen at year end because the devs are on vacation and so have time to work on fun stuff, but that doesn't necessarily scale across the entire company.
There is ongoing discussion & work happening re: Vulkan and development models but I don't expect anything new by year end.
Originally posted by mphuZ View PostIt is worth considering that ROCm 2.0 is still not released - can something be told about Linux during this release?
It will be Linux-only again though AFAIK.
Originally posted by mphuZ View PostLast year, AMDVLK was told just a week after the Adrenalin Edition was released.Last edited by bridgman; 15 December 2018, 02:52 PM.Test signature
Comment
Comment