Originally posted by Marc Driftmeyer
View Post
To put it in another perspective, let's say you're in school and you were assigned math homework. Typically, you're able to complete it just fine. But then, your bratty sibling comes around and keeps taking the book from you that has your equations, preventing you from getting your work done. Despite the fact you have the time, mental capacity, and willpower to do the work, you were unable to complete it. So by your logic, failing to do the homework is entirely your fault. Do you seriously agree with that?
Nobody except diehard AMD fans said the Vega was going to save AMD - don't blow things out of proportion. Hypothetically, let's say resources weren't taken away from Raja's team and it still inevitably turned out to be underwhelming. In such a case, it most certainly would have been better than it turned out to be. That doesn't mean it'd have been the GTX 1080Ti killer we all wanted, but it definitely would have been better.
Also, how exactly do you come to the conclusion that AMD's strength was always the CPU? You do realize the Bulldozer generation is what brought them into such serious debt and not the Radeon group, right? Nowadays, yes, the CPU division is AMD's main source of income, but to say it always has been is provably false.
Comment