Originally posted by fedux
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AMDGPU DC Display Code Ported To GCN 1.0 "Southern Islands" GPUs
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by libv View PostDave was one of the guys who sided with ATI to counter the real open source driver written by SuSE for AMD (ATIs new owner which was working hard to try to get ATI under control and to clean up the big mess that was there) and Dave only started development close to 5 months after the development of the real driver had started, and 2 months after the real driver was made public. Dave did more to keep the fglrx ways going than he helped progress either technically or with respect to open source affinity.
Like if kernel maintainers choose RadeonHD way instead of what AMD managenent was pushing for grass would be greener now. It's made sense to argue about it like 5 years ago since from your standpoint time were wasted for creating inferior driver, but today when we actually have functioning and almost fully featured one. Yeah it's could be more open, but AMD didn't wanted it for whatever reason so it's wouldn't work.
Everyone who used Linux learned hard way that community even with RH backing can't make GPU drivers without a lot of effort from vendor. Otherwise there will be more effort towards Nouveau and there is very little regardless of marketshare.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by SXX View PostSeriously you appear with your RadeonHD checklist in almost every topic I can remember. What the point?
Like if kernel maintainers choose RadeonHD way instead of what AMD managenent was pushing for grass would be greener now. It's made sense to argue about it like 5 years ago since from your standpoint time were wasted for creating inferior driver, but today when we actually have functioning and almost fully featured one. Yeah it's could be more open, but AMD didn't wanted it for whatever reason so it's wouldn't work.
Everyone who used Linux learned hard way that community even with RH backing can't make GPU drivers without a lot of effort from vendor. Otherwise there will be more effort towards Nouveau and there is very little regardless of marketshare.
Edit: engineers and managers aren't antiheroes but they aren't heroes either. Everyone occasionally makes bad judgement callsLast edited by nanonyme; 09 October 2018, 03:13 AM.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by pal666 View Postthe real issue is someone has to write it first and they are busy
Comment
-
Originally posted by SXX View PostSeriously you appear with your RadeonHD checklist in almost every topic I can remember. What the point?
Like if kernel maintainers choose RadeonHD way instead of what AMD managenent was pushing for grass would be greener now. It's made sense to argue about it like 5 years ago since from your standpoint time were wasted for creating inferior driver, but today when we actually have functioning and almost fully featured one. Yeah it's could be more open, but AMD didn't wanted it for whatever reason so it's wouldn't work.
Everyone who used Linux learned hard way that community even with RH backing can't make GPU drivers without a lot of effort from vendor. Otherwise there will be more effort towards Nouveau and there is very little regardless of marketshare.
Comment
-
Originally posted by humbug View Posti have a hawai r9 290, very capable card not that much slower than an rx 570. But i too have to manually enable amdgpu.Originally posted by spstarr View PostFor VGA connectors SI and CI can't use DC, so can't enable amdgpu.dc=1 still
Or some amdgpu.dc=auto which automatically decides whether to use DC or not, depending on whether VGA outputs exist.
Originally posted by schmidtbag View PostThat's because those cards are hardware incompatible with FP64. So, I'm not sure what else you can be asking for.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chithanh View PostHAWAII doesn't support VGA anyway. I don't know why DC is not already enabled for that chip.
Originally posted by chithanh View PostOr some amdgpu.dc=auto which automatically decides whether to use DC or not, depending on whether VGA outputs exist.
Comment
-
Originally posted by FireBurn View PostDoes that mean all that's missing now is the video acceleration stuff for SI? Someone outwith AMD was working on it, but I think they got stuck
Comment
-
Originally posted by libv View PostThere are some mammoth skeletons in the closets of Dave Airlie and John Bridgman and a few others. People should not glorify them, especially not for things they did not do or never did positively influence.
Yet even for person like me tone of your posts is just off. Might be you just post it here for Bridgman / Airlie and then it's up to you, but for anyone else this kind of attitude just looks horrible. For someone who're never heard of RadeonHD it's would be just batshit crazy.
Airlie wasn't the one behind KMS? Fine, tell it. They were guys who slowed down open source stack progress? Ok, that insigtful. But personal attacks over decade old events just look crazy.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment