13-Way NVIDIA OpenCL Performance & Perf-Per-Watt From Fermi To Maxwell

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • phoronix
    Administrator
    • Jan 2007
    • 67383
    #1

    13-Way NVIDIA OpenCL Performance & Perf-Per-Watt From Fermi To Maxwell

    Phoronix: 13-Way NVIDIA OpenCL Performance & Perf-Per-Watt From Fermi To Maxwell

    Similar to this week's article of looking at the OpenGL performance from the GeForce 9800GTX through GeForce GTX 980 Ti and TITAN X in preparation for Pascal Linux testing ahead, today I am doing a similar comparison while looking at the OpenCL compute performance. For thirteen NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards from Fermi to Maxwell I ran a popular OpenCL benchmark while comparing not only the raw performance but also the performance-per-Watt.

    13-Way NVIDIA OpenCL Performance & Perf-Per-Watt From Fermi To Maxwell - Phoronix
    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=23170
    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
    Tags: None
  • remm
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2007
    • 191
    #2
    Wondering how long it will take for 1080 support in nouveau

    Comment

    • coder
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2014
      • 8954
      #3
      Originally posted by phoronix View Post
      looking at the LuxMark performance
      Fixed that, for you.

      Was hoping to see the effect of the batch size change you made to the SHOC benchmarks.

      Comment

      • willmore
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2012
        • 622
        #4
        Michael, nice data, thanks! Does the 650 have an issue with the Lunmark benchmarks? Results for that card are missing (and I have one, so it's my reference into these cards performance). Also, the 750/750ti wasn't in there and that's a very popular card.

        Comment

        • Michael
          Phoronix
          • Jun 2006
          • 14308
          #5
          Originally posted by willmore View Post
          Michael, nice data, thanks! Does the 650 have an issue with the Lunmark benchmarks? Results for that card are missing (and I have one, so it's my reference into these cards performance). Also, the 750/750ti wasn't in there and that's a very popular card.
          I didn't bother with the cards really not capable of too great compute performance or relevant for future comparison to GTX 1070 / GTX 1080, if there's enough interest can add them.
          Michael Larabel
          https://www.michaellarabel.com/

          Comment

          • willmore
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2012
            • 622
            #6
            Originally posted by Michael View Post

            I didn't bother with the cards really not capable of too great compute performance or relevant for future comparison to GTX 1070 / GTX 1080, if there's enough interest can add them.
            If you did, the 750/750ti would be the most useful--though I don't own that card, so the comparison won't be as meaningful for me. It is my understanding that the 750 series was very popular, so I would suggest that be included--at least in the 1080/1070 reviews. Thank you.

            Comment

            Previous template Next
            Working...
            X