Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NVIDIA 364.19 Linux Driver Stabilizes The Wayland & Mir Support

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Pecisk View Post
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Wayla...driver_support Nvidia driver support is already half way trough added to muter and most likely will be there for GNOME 3.22/Fedora 25 release.
    did you read it? 50% is nvidia release. it is not needed, nobody is working on it and nobody will, it was posted before nvidia's eglstream patches were shot down on wayland ml
    Originally posted by Pecisk View Post
    Doesn't mean they ignore it because it is important for their users.
    no way to install nvidia driver in official repo is my definition of ignore
    Originally posted by Pecisk View Post
    Practical reality means Nvidia binary driver's support for Wayland will be way forward for it for foreseeable future
    well, it is what nvidia slaves want, but it is not reality. in reality fedora does fine without nvidia windows shit
    Originally posted by Pecisk View Post
    That's how open source works
    exactly: no nvidia windows shit in fedora repo
    Originally posted by Pecisk View Post
    devs themselves don't really know how to solve issues Nvidia has as app level hasn't standartized way to know capacities of drivers, etc.
    devs know nvidia's way is not going to work, that is enough for them to know
    Originally posted by Pecisk View Post
    Nvidia disagrees.
    nobody cares https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_36yNWw_07g

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Pecisk View Post
      Yes, they will. End of discussion.
      no they will not. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_36yNWw_07g
      End of discussion.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Temar View Post
        The success of Wayland will depend on proper graphics driver support.
        The success of Wayland is happened fact
        Originally posted by Temar View Post
        If one of the biggest manufacturers is not supported, people won't buy a new card, instead they will just stick with Xorg or don't use Linux at all.
        what are you smoking? biggest manufacturer goes to fuck itself, people will use nouveau

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Gusar View Post
          Apply the weston patches Nvidia wrote and voila, a wayland compositor on these drivers. So yes, you *can* technically run a wayland compositor on these drivers, the tech is there. That the tech is different from what compositors currently use does not suddenly make this tech not be there.
          lol. with enough patches you can turn linux into windows and run it on any windows driver. patched compositor is not necessarily still wayland or still working as intended
          Last edited by pal666; 23 April 2016, 03:59 PM.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Temar View Post
            Google and other manufacturers, who focus on embedded devices, won't have a problem with simply adding the necessary code to support the Nvidia driver.
            they won't have a problem using other hardware and letting nvidia fuck itself. that is why nvidia does some support of nouveau for tegra

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Temar View Post
              Well that is where my point of view differs. It was the Wayland guys who decided to design their architecture in a way that it can't be used by proprietary drivers. They had the vain hope they could force Nvidia into opening up their drivers. But that is not a pragmatic approach if you only got such a low market share.
              Nvidia doesn't need to open up their drivers to implement GBM, just like they didn't need to open them up to implement DRM/KMS. So I don't know where you got this part from. It's even less clear where you got the part from that the Wayland design was made explicitly with the goal of trying to get Nvidia to open up, so please provide some references for this claim.

              The open source devs told Nvidia two years ago at XDC why they don't think EGLStreams is the way to go. And Nvidia knew of GBM at that time, because it's not like GBM is a new thing, it's been in development for years, and being open source, everyone (including Nvidia!) could follow and even join its development. But Nvidia went with EGLStreams over GBM anyway.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Temar View Post
                Well that is where my point of view differs. It was the Wayland guys who decided to design their architecture in a way that it can't be used by proprietary drivers.
                it can be used by proprietary amd drivers. it can't be used by proprietary nvidia windows shit, but that is only nvidia's fault
                Originally posted by Temar View Post
                They had the vain hope they could force Nvidia into opening up their drivers
                nobody cares for that. documenting hardware is enough
                Originally posted by Temar View Post
                . But that is not a pragmatic approach if you only got such a low market share.
                linux has bigger marketshare than anything else. linux devices with graphics drivers are sold in billions each year. you are hallucinating
                Last edited by pal666; 23 April 2016, 03:58 PM.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Pecisk View Post
                  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Wayla...driver_support Nvidia driver support is already half way trough added to muter and most likely will be there for GNOME 3.22/Fedora 25 release.
                  my answer got lost, here is shorter one. it is same as redhat is supporting upstart. it is not. 50% is "nvidia claims it released some shit with wayland support" part, redhat part is 0%
                  Last edited by pal666; 23 April 2016, 01:42 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by pal666 View Post
                    i could link you some old stuff with redhat "investigating" upstart. will it make redhat switching from systemd?
                    Originally posted by pal666 View Post
                    it is same as redhat is supporting upstart. it is not.
                    You really don't know what's PID 1 in RHEL 6, do you?

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Temar View Post
                      It was the Wayland guys who decided to design their architecture in a way that it can't be used by proprietary drivers. They had the vain hope they could force Nvidia into opening up their drivers
                      btw, amount of tinfoil used by nvidia stockholm syndrome slaves is hillarious. do you know that wayland's first production use was non-desktops with proprietary drivers?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X