Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NVIDIA XRender Performance Improved

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • b15hop
    replied
    Hmm I'm trying to figure out what applications are really running much faster from xrender boost. Everything feels the same to me...?

    Leave a comment:


  • b15hop
    replied
    How do I enable the new Xrender feature. I just installed the beta driver. =)

    Leave a comment:


  • zerodivide
    replied
    Originally posted by platform View Post
    Soooo... if Qt is compiled with XRender support then KDE should be more responsive in 2D, right? What about Gtk and Gnome?
    From what i've seen, the only way to get these results is to set InitialPixmapPlacement to 2, which has the side effect of slowing down almost all gtk apps by a very significant amount. I'm not sure about qt apps, but I would guess it's the same.

    Leave a comment:


  • platform
    replied
    Soooo... if Qt is compiled with XRender support then KDE should be more responsive in 2D, right? What about Gtk and Gnome?

    Leave a comment:


  • FreeBzH
    replied
    Yeah !!! good news !

    It will be a very very intersting feature for e17 users... because Evas can render by two way, software, or Xrender.

    Great news!

    Leave a comment:


  • zerodivide
    replied
    I've done a bunch of benchmarks on the new beta driver and xrender, and render_bench is the only benchmark that shows these great results without any tweaking. Specifically, setting InitialPixmapPlacement to 2, at least on my 8800 gts.

    A better benchmark of xrender, that shows results closer to what you would get from real applications, is expedite. And yes, evas software rendering is still almost twice as fast as xrender in the overall expedite results.

    expedite
    InitialPixmapPlacement=2
    -----------------------------------
    nvidia-169.04 xrender - http://pastebin.ca/790277
    nvidia-100.14 xrender - http://pastebin.ca/790281
    nvidia-169.04 X11 - http://pastebin.ca/790279

    xrenderbenchmark
    -------------------------------------------
    100.14 - http://pastebin.ca/784454
    169.04 - http://pastebin.ca/784457

    xrenderbenchmark
    InitialPixmapPlacement=2
    -----------------------------------
    100.14 - http://pastebin.ca/790287
    169.04 - http://pastebin.ca/790286

    Leave a comment:


  • conholster
    replied
    Benchmarks are benchmarks, should there be any improvment in real usage? I've had the driver installed since it was released, but I dont think I've honestly noticed any diffrence...

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by Regenwald View Post
    oh well, i would like to see a large test when this new driver is stable. a comparison between the nvidia, nv and nouveau-driver would be really interesting...
    How'd you read my mind?

    Leave a comment:


  • Regenwald
    replied
    oh well, i would like to see a large test when this new driver is stable. a comparison between the nvidia, nv and nouveau-driver would be really interesting...

    Leave a comment:


  • Redeeman
    replied
    its totally nuts how much of an improvement this is, nearly unbelievable i wonder what they changed :P

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X