Originally posted by bug77
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NVIDIA 2010 Driver Year In Review
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by kazetsukai View PostAll the drivers used permit "generations" 4-6, and the later drivers permit Gen7 (Fermi). I think any of Gen6 would be valid tests, while anything Gen5 or lower probably isn't being optimized anymore.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by devius View PostShouldn't that be:
1: Geforce 2 series
2: Geforce 3,4 series (IIRC geforce3 is more close to 4 than to geforce2)
3: Geforce FX 5000 series
?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kazetsukai View Post1: GeForce 200,300 Series
2: GeForce 400 Series
3: GeForce 5000 Series (There were some PCI Express variants of the 5k series)
1: Geforce 2 series
2: Geforce 3,4 series (IIRC geforce3 is more close to 4 than to geforce2)
3: Geforce FX 5000 series
?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bug77 View PostTime permitting, maybe stick to the drivers that do support Fermi and retest in a future article?
1: GeForce 200,300 Series
2: GeForce 400 Series
3: GeForce 5000 Series (There were some PCI Express variants of the 5k series)
4: GeForce 6000 Series (SLI was introduced, PCI Express became much more mainstream)
5: GeForce 7000 Series (After this series AGP was more or less phased out)
6: GeForce 8000, 9000, 200 Series
7: Fermi
All the drivers used permit "generations" 4-6, and the later drivers permit Gen7 (Fermi). I think any of Gen6 would be valid tests, while anything Gen5 or lower probably isn't being optimized anymore.
Leave a comment:
-
"In this game, which is more demanding than Warsow/OpenArena, there was also not the performance regression found between the 195.36.15 and 196.36.24 driver updates."
But the regression found for earlier tests was found between 195.30 and 196.36.15. 195.30 wasn't tested for ETQW and later tests.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Michael View PostFermi doesn't work with all of the driver releases tested...
Time permitting, maybe stick to the drivers that do support Fermi and retest in a future article?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bug77 View PostThe test is a bit flawed. If there were any performance improvements in nvidia drivers, I don't expect them to apply to the 9 series. Hell, they're probably not optimizing for the 200 series anymore.
In short, you should have used a GTX400-something instead of the 9800GTX.
Leave a comment:
-
The test is a bit flawed. If there were any performance improvements in nvidia drivers, I don't expect them to apply to the 9 series. Hell, they're probably not optimizing for the 200 series anymore.
In short, you should have used a GTX400-something instead of the 9800GTX.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by phoronix View PostPhoronix: NVIDIA 2010 Driver Year In Review
At the end of each year for the past five years we have delivered "year in review" articles looking at the performance of NVIDIA's (and ATI/AMD's) proprietary Linux drivers. Both in terms of new features introduced during the year in their driver updates and benchmarking the driver releases to see how the performance has evolved over twelve months. With 2010 coming to an end, it is time for this year's driver reviews. We are starting this year seeing how the NVIDIA performance has matured in 2010.
http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=15558
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: