Originally posted by GreatWalrus
View Post
NVIDIA's Release Happiness Continues Into April
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Then what is your purpose of buying an expensive GPU?
You are spending a fortune to buy a hope? While others spends less and do everything they want to do with their computer?
I just enjoyed several movies and played a good game of Nexius 2.5. That's what I paied for. That's the purpose of my computer.
I used to be like you. Bought X1600PRO, X1600XT, X1950PRO, X1900XT, HD 2900XT, HD 4650, HD 4850 etc... just to hope that one day ATI's driver can be better. Well now this 'day' seems to be still very far away. By realizing that I chose NV as my current main desktop. This is the first time that I did not regret that I chose the right card afterall. A bit sad on the inside but true. So I am going to still hope that one day OSS can pull all these stuff together, while enjoying me NVidia experience.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Whatever the quality of Nvidia drivers could be, I still bet on ATI as they released their GPU specs, allowing an open-source driver.
Within months, I really think open-source driver can be in a very good state, allowing nice video playback, opengl support and flawless 2D acceleration.
Well, perhaps a year, but I don't care waiting the open source / fglrx to mature and seeing my HD4870 aging, as there is still not so many games to play with those beautifull drivers that are or are promised to be...
What the use of fine tuned drivers for 1+ Gflop GPU for playing teeworld or even ETQW ??
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Jimmy View PostExcept for the part about AMD's drivers not being any damn good next to their competition.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by susikala View PostThis is presented a bit one-sidedly. Quantity is not everything that's important, I think. I mean, theoretically you could take AMD's open source drivers and bump the release number on every little bugfix, since that seems to be what NVIDIA are trying to do with their driver.
They're trying to keep the cake and eat it -- keep their drivers closed, but create the illusion they keep you on the bleeding edge. That doesn't chance the fact you're pretty much forced to use a binary blob.
Even if NVIDIA releases a driver every single damn day, AMD's strategy is unarguably better.
Leave a comment:
-
-
This is presented a bit one-sidedly. Quantity is not everything that's important, I think. I mean, theoretically you could take AMD's open source drivers and bump the release number on every little bugfix, since that seems to be what NVIDIA are trying to do with their driver.
They're trying to keep the cake and eat it -- keep their drivers closed, but create the illusion they keep you on the bleeding edge. That doesn't chance the fact you're pretty much forced to use a binary blob.
Even if NVIDIA releases a driver every single damn day, AMD's strategy is unarguably better.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Most of these are beta. AMD also releases several beta drivers within a month's period. Difference is that AMD's beta program is closed while nvidia's is not.
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment: