Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Linux Gaming Performance

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Linux Gaming Performance

    Phoronix: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Linux Gaming Performance

    Last week NVIDIA announced the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER as their newest Turing "SUPER" graphics card coming in at $229+ USD and delivering around 1.5x faster performance than the GeForce GTX 1060. For those wondering about the Linux gaming performance potential for this graphics card, here are our initial tests of this new graphics card using the EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER.

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Typos:

    Originally posted by phoronix View Post
    With Warhammer II, the GTX 1660 SUPER came out just slighty ahead of the Radeon RX 590 -- compared to some of the other more dominating results.
    Originally posted by phoronix View Post
    Batman: Arham Origins was up first as a title

    Comment


    • #3
      GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is a strong contender if looking for a Linux-friendly graphics
      Software: Did nouveau get reclocking working? If it hasn't I would say it's Linux-ready not Linux-friendly. Not WindowsVM-friendly either (see infamous Nvidia Error 43).

      Hardware: Not bad if you compare it with a 1660. Same GPU (TU116-300) but GDDR6 would make a difference. If you don't have $50 extra for a 1660 Ti then this card makes sense, not sure why anyone would buy a card > $200 USD that doesn't have GDDR6 though.

      Now Nvidia has twice as much non-RTX GDDR6 cards!

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Michael
        The only caveat is the driver reporting it as just a NVIDIA "Device"
        Does the driver handle this itself or use information from lspci? Maybe you just need to run update-pciids or wait for the PCI database to add the GTX1660 Super and then run it.

        Comment


        • #5
          Michael

          Check you daylight savings settings

          The forum timestamps haven't fallen back

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by skeevy420 View Post
            Michael

            Check you daylight savings settings

            The forum timestamps haven't fallen back
            They are behaving correctly, server is on EST. Your post just now showed up correctly.
            Michael Larabel
            https://www.michaellarabel.com/

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Michael View Post

              They are behaving correctly, server is on EST. Your post just now showed up correctly.
              It's still showing up +1H on my end. Double checked and my settings are on CST.

              Comment


              • #8
                Why did they release this card when there's 1660ti?
                Will nvidia keep both on the market?

                Comment


                • #9
                  I wish AMD/NVidia/Intel would release a card optimized for performance/watt not only for max performance.
                  With all these cards flooding the market, someone can at least bring out 1 card to fill that niche...
                  They can market it as "eco friendly", lol.
                  Last edited by Raka555; 06 November 2019, 07:28 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Raka555 View Post
                    I wish AMD/NVidia/Intel would release a card optimized for performance/watt not only for max performance.
                    With all these cards flooding the market, someone can at least bring out 1 card to fill that niche...
                    They can market it as "eco friendly", lol.
                    The Vega64 might actually do well here when capped at 140W power budget like the miners did.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X