Originally posted by schmidtbag
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NVIDIA Releases The GeForce GTX 1650 At $149 USD, Linux Benchmarks Incoming
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by torsionbar28 View Post
GTX 1650's price is closer to GTX 1060 but marking references performance of GTX 1050 Ti and completely ignores price difference, also it supports "OpenGL 4/5"
Meanwhile nouveau is still crashing (OS hang) on my GT 1030 using latest updates on Fedora 29 (nothing new).
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedOriginally posted by torsionbar28 View PostWith the high res textures that newer games have, even 1080p can require more than 4GB.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DoMiNeLa10 View PostThe amount of VRAM on that card looks like an intentional bottleneck, just like most of the Turing lineup in general. Nvidia has gotten pretty greedy, and it seems like they want their cards to become obsolete the moment next generation comes out.
They over forecasted crypto-currency demand and when the currencies started drying up, sales fell to the basement.
But they already had an accelerated product release schedule based on that demand cycle and that is why it seems the Turing came out so fast.
It's also why AMD looks like they are behind. They didn't throw the proverbial marbles to keep up with NVidia's irrational release cycle (some would call it an arms race).
In short, what goes up, must come down.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DoMiNeLa10 View PostThe amount of VRAM on that card looks like an intentional bottleneck, just like most of the Turing lineup in general. Nvidia has gotten pretty greedy, and it seems like they want their cards to become obsolete the moment next generation comes out.
Leave a comment:
-
The AMD response to this is the cheaper 4GB RX 570 (I checked today and these are £125 now, the 1650 is £140+), which outperforms the card by a bit.
The 4GB RX 580 is in some cases price competitive with some of the overclocked 1650 SKUs as well.
The downside is the higher power consumption from the older design, and therefore probably the higher fan noise.
The upside is excellent open source support from AMD, as well as the additional performance.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
interesting I 'm eagerly waiting for the AMD response this could compete maybe with the navi 3060, given the price tag? or maybe the 2650 should be the runner up?
the 1650 is already laggin a lot with the rx580 and the 3060 should have the same performance, if the 2650 is just a refresh, AMD will be winning there, because the navi 3060 will have a price tag of 130 usd.
this is starting to look a lot like the time when first generation Ryzens were launched and force intel, after a while, to push the prices down . It took some months but all intels prices went really down, they simply couldn't compete.Last edited by Kayote; 23 April 2019, 12:23 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by torsionbar28 View PostSome bizarro sku's out there. Like this *triple* slot 1650. Ugh, why???
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by torsionbar28 View Post
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedThe amount of VRAM on that card looks like an intentional bottleneck, just like most of the Turing lineup in general. Nvidia has gotten pretty greedy, and it seems like they want their cards to become obsolete the moment next generation comes out.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: