Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Shows Very Strong Compute Performance Potential

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    I see all these obscure benchmarks yet no tests that actually matter, like crypto mining. The business that decides where half the cards end up.

    Comment


    • #12
      Can someone tell me why rocm is failing in half the tests? Rocm should be a lot more stable than that

      Comment


      • #13
        Impressive performance, but then this is a massive chip on 12nm being compared to smaller chips on 14/16nm. Guess we can start to get ideas about the performance a more reasonably priced Navi on 7nm will offer.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by cl333r View Post
          Nvidia or AMD?
          If Nvidia - I expect a year from now a lot better drivers now that they're rewriting some of their driver components in Rust.
          Slower is not better.

          Comment


          • #15
            What a joke of an article...
            No benchmark of 1080 Ti vs 2080 ? Really ? Is this article sponsored by Nvidia ?

            Originally posted by varikonniemi View Post
            I see all these obscure benchmarks yet no tests that actually matter, like crypto mining. The business that decides where half the cards end up.
            And this.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by YamashitaRen View Post
              What a joke of an article...
              No benchmark of 1080 Ti vs 2080 ? Really ? Is this article sponsored by Nvidia ?

              As stated multiple times already, I don't have an RTX 2080 (non Ti) at least not yet.... Obviously if I did, I would have been including it in the articles...
              Michael Larabel
              https://www.michaellarabel.com/

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by phoronix View Post
                SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing v2015-11-10Performance / Cost - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash
                Is this rounded to the nearest $0.01? It seems odd that these 3 cards would otherwise have identical results.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by ResponseWriter View Post
                  Impressive performance, but then this is a massive chip on 12nm being compared to smaller chips on 14/16nm. Guess we can start to get ideas about the performance a more reasonably priced Navi on 7nm will offer.
                  1.35x of Vega 64 is what they've said. Also, 2x performance per Watt. Calibrate your expectations to that.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by varikonniemi View Post
                    I see all these obscure benchmarks yet no tests that actually matter, like crypto mining. The business that decides where half the cards end up.
                    Not with crytpo crashing, a new wave of ASIC miners on the market, and these cards being so expensive.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
                      Almost seems like this GPU should be part of the Titan series.
                      They're probably just building up a stockpile of higher-binned TU102's and maybe waiting for some market feedback to see how to price it, but it's sort of a given that we will see it in a new Titan card. The 352-bit / 11 GB memory spec tells you they're holding back, much like the GTX 1080 Ti.

                      Also, if you compare the boost clock with the RTX Quadro 6000/8000, you can see they're holding back a bit on that, as well.

                      However, note that the fp benchmarks are all single-precision. Unlike the Titan V, which was build on a 100-series chip, this will not be the card to buy if you want fp64. For that, save your pennies and spring for a Titan V. I expect that will remain the go-to card for "budget" GPU Compute, for some time.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X